Haterobics said, "'m sorry the Tony voters did not validate your opinions. They failed you."
No, the voters failed performers. You're missing the point. Read the NY Times story and today's reviews. They're saying it was a protest vote which meant they didn't vote on its merits, but b/c they didn't like the alternatives. That's not a compliment.
Though many of you may not like Mark Reidel of NY Post, he wrote, "Its (BV) sweep of the Tonys is a sharp rebuke to the family-friendly franchise shows that are gobbling up Broadway.Broadway is in danger of becoming a theme park, but Tony voters staged a revolution Sunday night, saying, in effect: No more shows based on famous movies or cartoons."
He wasn't alone. Many other critics said the same. So it didn't win b/c it was worthy of its award, but rather to send a message. I could see the Best Musical b/c the others were less than rewarding, but to give it all just to send a message invalidated the voter's integrity. Sound or lighting for Band's Visit? Come on.
I was at MG and ran into a voter. Before the show even started, she said she only planned to stay 15 minutes because she had other things to do and asked me what the show was about and was it worth it. If that is what you have for voters, the whole thing is a farce.
Frankly, this year's musical choices were sorely lacking. MG packs them in b/c it attracts the younger set. S/Bob couldn't figure out its audience. It was too long for a kid's show and too infantile for adults along with the mindless and inconsiderate parents/children who treated the theater like a playground and ignored the stage. How the actors endured that was beyond me.
If BV was as great as everyone says, it should've been reflected in its box office numbers. And as you all know, the $ is what keeps shows alive and industry employees working. Bottom line, vote because the show deserves it and not because it sends a message. To do otherwise makes the messenger (voter) disingenuous and the outcome a farce.