I am not in the business, just a passionate audience member. So, my question is for real, not snarky.
Are non-union tours cheaper to run than union tours? I assume the answer is 'yes' but I don't know. Given that the show was a failure on Broadway (although I LOVED it), does a non-union tour become the only way it is economically viable, i.e., 'to have any chance of success, we need to keep costs as low as possible'? Finally, and I am serious here, how do people associated with the tour lose from non-union productions? I am guessing that, although employed, they are paid less? Other considerations?
Updated On: 2/20/18 at 03:27 PM