Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/25/18

Also, you will find information on each show's historical grosses, cumulative grosses and other statistics on how each show stacked up this week and in the past.

Click Here to Visit the Broadway Grosses...

Up for the week by attendance was: LATIN HISTORY FOR MORONS (7.7%), THE PLAY THAT GOES WRONG (7.7%), SPONGEBOB SQUAREPANTS (4.8%), THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA (4.8%), ONCE ON THIS ISLAND (4.2%), THE BAND'S VISIT (4.1%), JOHN LITHGOW: STORIES BY HEART (3.6%), BEAUTIFUL (2.8%), HELLO, DOLLY! (1.9%), A BRONX TALE THE MUSICAL (1.8%), WAITRESS (1.6%), WICKED (1.5%), COME FROM AWAY (0.2%), DEAR EVAN HANSEN (0.1%),

Down for the week by attendance was: ESCAPE TO MARGARITAVILLE (-15.5%), KINKY BOOTS (-10.6%), CHICAGO (-6.9%), THE PARISIAN WOMAN (-6.5%), FARINELLI AND THE KING (-5.0%), SCHOOL OF ROCK (-0.7%), ANASTASIA (-0.1%), HAMILTON (-0.1%), THE BOOK OF MORMON (-0.1%),

Click Here to Visit the BroadwayWorld Grosses...

How did A Bronx Tale go up in capacity but down in money?

Frozen and AiA both with great starts!

Waitress doing well, but surprised it didn't hit capacity with Sara healthy for all shows...?

I thought the grosses would be better since the area schools were closed. But glad Spongebob went up.

a-mad said: "Frozen and AiA both with great starts!"

Angels (I assume that's what that ridiculous acronym referred to) most certainly did NOT do well. Hopefully it will improve but this seems like a potentially major miscalculation.

HogansHero said: "a-mad said: "Frozen and AiA both with great starts!"

Angels (I assume that's what that ridiculous acronym referred to) most certainly did NOT do well. Hopefully it will improve but this seems like a potentially major miscalculation."

Apologies on the "ridiculous" acronym - I didn't realize typing "AiA" would cause such a freak-out. Let me know if there's a better acronym, or if I should just type "Angels" when referring to this production. Didn't realize there were certain rules around acronyms when posting a quick message on this board...

@a-mad, sorry for the freak out. It's just that Angels is kinda hallowed ground for me and a lot of others and has been called that pretty much from the beginning, and isn't THAT hard to type. Also AIA is the well known acronym of a major professional organization.

@lemiz3001, if I can inquire of YOUR know it all self, a few questions: (1) on what planet are the Angels' numbers fine? They look scary bad to me, what with the low avg price, and the pretty darn high nut. And (2) where are you getting this healthy advance nonsense? This is not a hard thing to prove unfounded, even if you start out knowing nothing at all. Now yes, it can turn around, and as I said I hope it does, but there are a lot of very nervous people right now, who probably thought they knew it all too. If you want to have a more detailed and reality based discussion of the show's numbers, I am happy to do that with you.

HogansHero said: "a-mad said: "Frozen and AiA both with great starts!"

Angels (I assume that's what that ridiculous acronym referred to) most certainly did NOT do well. Hopefully it will improve but this seems like a potentially major miscalculation."

I thought Angel’s numbers were horrible too, but as someone who has just started following box office numbers in the last few months, I wasn’t sure if that was the percentage compared to an eight show week or prorated as they only played 3 shows. If it’s the latter, those numbers are horrible. I guess can I see why it could be hard sell (a straight play, a two parter with long time commitment, not exactly tourist friendly), but I expected this to be one of hard to get tickets of the year, especially based on its recent popular run in London and its revered status. .

comets said: "Anyways, who was the target audience for the John Lithgow show? Shocked it did as well as it did."

Yeah. I’m not sure. I’m a fan of his acting, but this doesn’t hold much appeal to me. I’m guessing it appeals to the bridge and tunnel crowd any maybe baby boomers standing in line at TKTS.

222disneyland said: "qolbinau said: "I find the Hamilton number to be insane. It's just not THAT good. And I felt incredibly ripped off when the performance I saw had a bunch of mediocre understudy performances in the lead roles. It felt a bit stale/theme-park like rather than a genuine piece of art."



I am Australian too. I really did love it. But 3M dollars wtf???"

It’s my favorite show so I don’t begrudge it its success. As someone who has to travel to NYC and never knows a year or 9 months ahead of time, I do wish it was easier to get tickets closer to trips without paying exorbitant re-sell prices. That’s why I’ve only seen it twice. Once in 2015 with the OBC cast in the last row of rear mezzanine at hotel concierge resell prices. Then last year in Chicago when I was there for a quick work trip. Also, at resell prices, but much more affordable. But what are you gonna do? Whether you agree that it should be or not, it’s a phenomenon that’s not likely to subside anytime soon.