@BritCrit I agree with everything you say, because it is based on reasonable prognostications, a far cry from what the posts to which I reacted said.
@sweetlips the facts I (numbered and) stated are not opinions: they are demonstrable facts (other than my intelligent assumption that the show's nut is not over $700k, which I stated as "likely," which it is. Had they not been, I would not have labelled them as such. And the denial of those facts is what around here we call fake news. Now about the numbering: I do that for clarity, and if for some reason you equate that with some "cranky old teacher," so be it. I think clarity has its virtues, and all of us cannot be as clear as you without the magic bullets.
@Curtain, I am guessing your "huh" is about the slight imprecision of what you quote, which obviously, in context, is meant to say that the show has returned some capital to investors, and not that it has returned all of it as one might read the literal quote to say. Re Oklahoma, mindful that no show "must" close unless and until it is kicked to the curb by the landlord, or cannot secure sufficient funding to proceed, I think the case for closure of Oklahoma certainly exceeds that for Tootsie, even though I personally would rather see the former stay around.