tracker
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
pixeltracker

Company cast recording: original or revival?- Page 3

Company cast recording: original or revival?

raulmark Profile Photo
raulmark
#50re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/16/09 at 7:39pm

Both!
if you can, rent the DVD of the making of the OBC Recording. Then watch the PBS special "Broadway: The American Musical"....then rent the DVD of the live recording of the 2006 Revival and then you can decide which to listen 1st....which will probably lead you to wanting to listen to BOTH!
Did that help?

Ed_Mottershead
#51re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/16/09 at 7:47pm

Since we're bandying the name of Dean Jones around, how many posters here actually SAW him do it in the original production?


BroadwayEd

PalJoey Profile Photo
PalJoey
#52re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/16/09 at 9:52pm

I did, as I've posted many, many times in many, many threads.

I saw Dean Jones once and Larry Kert four times, and I vastly preferred Larry Kert.


chino Profile Photo
chino
#53re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/16/09 at 9:53pm

I really liked the revival with Esparza.

frontrowcentre2 Profile Photo
frontrowcentre2
#54re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/16/09 at 11:00pm

With rare exceptions, I always suggest starting with the original. These were the performances worked out by the actors with the original director and the authors in consultation.

With Company both Dean Jones and Larry Kert were issued. Kert's voice was tracked in over Jones and he sounds removed from the action. Sony issued it on CD in the U.K. (and in Canada) but not in the U.S. and it was deleted after about 3 years, so finding copies may be difficult. Do not pay huge amounts for it. Some sellers charge over $100 for a copy and it is not worth it.

As has been mentioned Kert's version of "Bering Alive" is a bonus track on Sony's current CD edition of the Broadway cast. (The original CD edition Columbia CK 3550 was deleted when the reissue came out.)

Of the revivals, for me the 2005 with Esparza is preferable to either the 1995 (Broadway) or 1996 (London) recordings. If pushed get the original Broadway cast CD and the DVD of the 2005 revival.


Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!

I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com

frontrowcentre2 Profile Photo
frontrowcentre2
#54re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/16/09 at 11:00pm

With rare exceptions, I always suggest starting with the original. These were the performances worked out by the actors with the original director and the authors in consultation.

With Company both Dean Jones and Larry Kert were issued. Kert's voice was tracked in over Jones and he sounds removed from the action. Sony issued it on CD in the U.K. (and in Canada) but not in the U.S. and it was deleted after about 3 years, so finding copies may be difficult. Do not pay huge amounts for it. Some sellers charge over $100 for a copy and it is not worth it.

As has been mentioned Kert's version of "Bering Alive" is a bonus track on Sony's current CD edition of the Broadway cast. (The original CD edition Columbia CK 3550 was deleted when the reissue came out.)

Of the revivals, for me the 2005 with Esparza is preferable to either the 1995 (Broadway) or 1996 (London) recordings. If pushed get the original Broadway cast CD and the DVD of the 2005 revival.


Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!

I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com

CurtainPullDowner Profile Photo
CurtainPullDowner
#56re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/16/09 at 11:00pm

This is kicking the proverbial horse,
I also saw Jones and Kert and I thought they were both great.
They were likable and funny, Kert sang the show beautifully and Jones was the perfect Bobby trying to please everyone but himself.
That jaded, bored attitude on the last revival was so wrong.
The 60's were a time when people were exploring and curious, was there a down side to that?
Of course, but not untill BEING ALIVE did that hit the audience.

nicole neumann2 Profile Photo
nicole neumann2
#57re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/17/09 at 8:41am

the loved the Revival of company.

darquegk Profile Photo
darquegk
#58re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/17/09 at 9:35am

If you're learning ABOUT the show, go with the OBC.

If you're LEARNING the show, go with the revival. Odd orchestrations aside, this one is much closer to the sound of the current licensed orchestrations, and has the vocal keys and harmonies of the current licensed Company.

ColorTheHours048 Profile Photo
ColorTheHours048
#59re: Company cast recording: original or revival?
Posted: 4/17/09 at 12:53pm

The OBC is a classic. It sounds like the time period and it's just all-around a great recording. One of the best.

But the revival boasts some gorgeous singing and the orchestrations (while scaled down) are beautiful and the sound is clearer. I wasn't a HUGE fan of Raul's performance as a whole, but his singing was, without a doubt, the best rendition of Bobby ever.


Videos