ChorusKitty said: "Having seen the tour of the original production of "Dancin'" I'm curious as to why this show is being labeled as "Bob Fosse's Dancin'"? Sure many of the musical numbers are retained but the Bob Fosse vision of them is not there. The "Sing, Sing, Sing" section is the closest to the original version. "Homage to Bob Fosse" might be a more apt title.
I don't think every revival has to necessarily mirror the original, but anyone coming to see this current production would surely be flummoxed to understand how the original production could have lasted over 1700 performances. Everything is over thought and overyly altered to the point where Fosse's vision and Wayne Cilento's vision collide. Fosse's genius was in being able to edit both the choreography AND the staging and lighting in order to let the actors shine. This revival is like a "Project Runway" design where we desperately need Tim Gunn to come in and scream, "Edit! Edit! There's too much whickety whack!"
Overall the male dancers were far more polished and closer to capturing the Fosse aesthetic than the women in the cast. Peter John Chursin, especially, captures the Fosse style flawlessly. Not that these dancers aren't all very talented, but would Fosse have hired most of them? Color me dubious."
Fosse would not have hired most of them as they lack the Fosse edge, sensuality and his signature movement style. Peter John, Jacob and Tony really stood out along with Kolton. The female dancers were terribly lacking his style and just blend in to the background. No standout female dancers. Talented dancers yes - Fosse dancers no! Lighting is Tony worthy.
"Anything you do, let it it come from you--then it will be new."
Sunday in the Park with George
Updated On: 4/29/23 at 02:52 PM