Posted: 9/2/18 at 11:53am
Does anyone here know what types of changes are made to a national tour when it starts out as Equity and eventually changes to Non-Equity? I'm asking because that is what happened to the current tour of Something Rotten and I was thinking of catching it when it comes to Detroit, MI later this month.
I saw Something Rotten on Broadway with the OBC and loved it, so I made sure to see it when it went on tour in MI earlier this year. The tour started as Equity and was the cast with Rob McClure and Adam Pascal. It was great! Broadway quality (of course because it was an equity broadway across america tour) and basically the same production (sets, costumes, orchestra, overall production value) as Broadway - even though Adam Pascal's understudy was on which was disappointing, but the understudy was great.
I now see that the tour is coming back to Detroit however it was confirmed on Playbill.com that it is now a Non-Equity Tour. The new promo photos show the same sets and costumes but obviously a different cast.
So my question is, will this Non-Equity version have a smaller production value and be of lower quality overall? I understand that Non-Equity means that the actors are not in the Actor's Union and may not be getting paid fairly, but does the change affect the quality of the rest of the aspects of the production? Or will it be up to par with other Equity National Tours? I have seen several broadway national tours, but never a non-equity tour - very curious about what I'd be in for.
Does anyone here have strong recommendations about equity vs non-equity tour quality?
Would appreciate some insight from others that know more about the differences! Thanks!
