I have just seen the film for the first time.
How is it different from the stage production? I can't imagine a lot of it being done on stage...
I didn't really enjoy the score. It had a few good musical numbers, but nearly all of the music is the same. Musical repetitiveness is usually a good thing, but there wasn't enough distinctive, original music.
WHERE'S THE PLOT!? Actually, I sort of enjoyed it. It was a film about Tevye's family and way of life. That's it. No more, no less. It was a simple, nice story. But I don't like the feeling I got from it in the end. I felt like I wasted three hours of my life. Like nothing happened.
I kind of understand how it became such a classic Broadway musical...and yet I don't.
But my judgement is based off of the film only. Is the stage production different?
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle