"No one has a valid opinion on the version opening on Broadway, since we don't know what changed and there is a good deal of cast upheaval."
Haterobics, you're totally right on that, so I'll only talk about Cambridge. I'm one of the people who absolutely loved it at A.R.T. I saw the show more than once, just for love. I also know a bunch of local kids who loved it, the youngest being age six. The show has a very smooth flow and a very fast pace; I don't foresee kids snoozing, whatever else might happen (though I suppose it could be slowed down in the new version? That would be a bad mistake).
Something I haven't seen discussed, especially not by critics, is that the show is full of contradiction. The critics, both positive and negative, seemed to feel that the show's main message was the show's most *overt* message: that playfulness and imagination are valuable and are useful for treating pain and grief. Well, sure, the show says that -- and it says the opposite, and it says several other conflicting things. In terms of "what is childhood?" and "what is Neverland?" the show gives many conflicting messages. Personally I liked these contradictions -- I found them to create depth and texture.
Updated On: 11/29/14 at 09:54 PM