The biggest problem I have with the idea of this show is the extremely limited dynamic range of the Go-Gos catalog of music, especially their hits. You could set a metronome to We Got the Beat, Vacation, Mad About You and Head Over Heels alone and barely register the change from one tune to the next, which is why, love their songs as much as I do, I can only take them in small doses. Even in the 80s, I could rarely sit through an entire album in one sitting. The score would need MASSIVE amounts of artistic license in the arrangements and orchestrations to create some interesting theatrical variations and based on what I've heard, it's not happening nearly enough.
Arcadia itself is a fun romp and the idea to adapt it for a musical isn't a bad one. Not even with a (mostly) Go-Gos jukebox score. Mimicking the era smacks of an attempt to ride the coattails of Something Rotten, but it doesn't really work when you layer on contrived faux Tudorian-era language on top of a story 99.9% of audiences aren't familiar with. If you're not going to attempt much change in the arrangements of the songs, then set it in the 80s and use that vernacular. Otherwise, make it current-day and focus on the arrangements and writing. This thing was just muddied with too many conceptual ideas and lack of artistic objectivity. I don't know how anyone can listen to that pretend stylized dialogue and find it cute (much less funny) for that long. It reminds me of a 7 year-old that accidentally says something the adults laugh at, so they just repeat it, thinking they'll surely get the same reaction every single time, until they are either yelled at or just ignored. This thing reminds me of his attempt to reinvent On a Clear Day. An interesting idea that fails in execution so spectacularly, you have to wonder how he never saw its glaring flaws.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
I saw the show again today to see what (if anything changed from the first preview). I accepted the ticket before Whizzer posted saying nothing was different /‘d he was pretty much right. The show tightened up some and I noticed a few little differences but really it’s just a tighter version of what they began with. And that’s such a shame. It went from me probably giving it a D- to now a solid D.
Suddenly pulling all availability from TDF usually means that producers have begun to alert discount distributors and ticketing services that a closing notice is about to be posted.
I don't think there's much overlap between Go-go's fans and Arcadia theater scholars. That's like asking boxing fans to go to a ballet. Should have been a Go-go's show, nothing to do with Arcadia.
It’s so interesting to read the different reactions to the show from here to other places online (where many love it). I’m hoping to go next weekend to see it and see which side I fall on lol.
bear88 said: "Jeff Whitty, who wrote the original Head Over Heels before parting ways with the production under murky circumstances, is decidedly unhappy with Sara Holdren's rave reviewof the show in Vulture for what he says are "ugly sneers" in her portrayal of his hypothetical pitch (clearly written as a joke), an allegedly inaccurate characterization of the original show's lackof iambic pentameter (Whitty says his opening night script of the show was written in iambic pentameter; Holdren relies on an interview with Bonnie Milligan, who has played Pamela since the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, who says it originally wasn't). He also commented on Holdren's Twitter account, expressing annoyance with what he views as a disrespectful description of Avenue Q.
Whitty has been silent about the show, presumably for contractual reasons, but he's made it clear that he has nothing to do with the itscurrent incarnation.
None of this probably matters now. I just haven't read much from Whitty, who spit venom tonight at a critic who liked the revised version of the show."
For what it's worth, I noticed today that Whitty deleted his attack on Holdren's review of Head Over Heels, as well as his sharply two sharply critical responses to her tweet linking to the review. Whitty may have thought better of his remarks, which seemed a bit over the top, or he may have been told that he's not supposed to comment on the show - much less one of the musical's few rave reviews. I have no idea.
Tickets are back for sale on TDF. Not too many dates available like last time. Not sure if it is selling well at the box office or TKTS (which I hope it is), but TDF has a lot less than the last time they were up.
ok. saw the show again a second time- and i actually loved it this time. (loathed it the first time) i guess attitude going in really does have alot to do with it. (and the 2 glasses of Fro-zayyy) lol but just didnt take the show seriously and we were laughing the whole time and bopping along to the beat. The entire balcony was closed. and the dress circle was 50% full. But the cast works SO hard. I really do feel bad for them.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
mbruth said: "robskynyc said: "The entire balcony was closed. and the dress circle was 50% full."
Uh-oh. I have tickets for first row balcony on Saturday..."
Like Dramamama611 stated, they will re-seat you. But go early, because it looked like first come, first serve. I was later than I usually am, but flirted, and still got second row center.
Thanks for the tip. I'm a bit bummed because i love sitting front row balcony. Hopefully we can get something just as good. My husband, who can rant for hours against jukebox musicals, requested these tickets for his birthday. Just glad it hasn't closed.