DAME said: "So I saw this last night as part of the Outfest film festival. It was a late 9:45 pm screening and the last film being showed that evening so it had that working against it. Audience response was tepid. It was not for me. But I wasn't bored. . The movie picks up a little bit with the Titanic story. But until that point I found myself trying to adjust to whatever the hell this was on the screen. I did love Audra , Cheyenne and Martha Plimpton. But Audra especially tore it up. The director introduced the film and said that to his knowledge it was only the 5th or 6th off broadway musical to be adapted for the screen. He also boasted about the actors all singing live on set. That might be. But the movie is obviously heavily juiced and mixed. In the young cast Rumor Willis (sp?) faired the best. I also liked the guy who plays Leo. Especially in the final scene with Martha Plimpton. This is definitely low budget film making.
I saw the film at the Kansas City LGBT Film Fest several weeks ago, and my response is very similar to that of DAME. I certainly was never, ever bored, and I found several of the stories to be absolutely thrilling.
But the first couple of vignettes were a slog. I did not enjoy Nolan Gerard Funk nor Jenna Ushkowitz. There was absolutely no spark to their performances.
Biggest surprise of the film is Rumer Willis - her singing and acting were fantastic ("Tom"
and I felt the direction of the "Tom" segment was not as claustrophobic as some of the first ones. The action moving outdoors and into Central Park was refreshing after what had come before.
As always, Audra knocks it out of the park, and Cheyenne Jackson and Martha Plimpton were very enjoyable.
And above all, this movie really was something DIFFERENT to see at the cinema. I loved the indie feel, and I wish the film well. I'd like to see more musicals on screen that aren't just our big commercial hits.
I'm not going to lie, I am not a big fan of LaChiusa, and this movie did not change my mind, but I'm glad I saw it.