I think Cats definitely beats Wicked when it comes to choreography! I mean, when I saw Wicked in London, the choreography was all over the place, extremely messy and distracting... just poor!
Anyway, both shows have great costumes, makeup, catchy music/tunes BUT both shows lack depth and plot (in Wicked's case, its much better but not THAT much better imo!).
The difference between the 2 shows is that I Cats is generally dull and Wicked is more enjoyable, i mean... there must be SOMETHING which suits you... the costumes, the set, the songs, the people singing the sh*t of those songs, the monkeys, the lightings...
Here in UK, Wicked's pretty much well known in London and the musical theatre people, it certainly attracts alot teenage girls and non-theatre people. But you come out feeling you had a gd night unlike Cats which you come out feeling 'God, I should have watched ____ instead or stayed home or bought myself ____ with that money!'
All That Jazz
Check out & support my drawings @ www.facebook.com/felixdrawings