Lot666 said: "AADA81 said: "I know many people think Broadway itself has turned into the northeast version of a theme park, with 'Phantom', 'Chicago' and 'The Lion King' being the favorite rides for returning tourists,"
What doPhantom and Chicago have to do with theme parks?"
If I may try to bolster the analogy in theme park terms much more familiar to The Lion King, I think they simply mean that stuff like King Kong is like Disney’s new Frozen ride. It’s big, expensive, and looks great, but it steps on the legacy of previous attractions with its mediocrity. However, the name recognition and technology really sells it. Meanwhile stuff like Phantom and Chicago are Broadway’s “Haunted Mansion” or “Space Mountain,” long-standing institutions with trusted audiences who will nearly always come back and recommend it to their friends.
Broadway can then be compared to a money-making behemoth that is only able to uphold the attractions that it knows will succeed, while legitimate art struggles to make a huge impact without major advertising deals or movie adaptation rights. Some/most of the time, I’d agree.