The issue many attribute to the Broadway production was that it took itself to seriously...while the West End production was just about having a good time. That's the first I've ever heard of that explanation. Sounds like "many" didn't actually see both productions. Neither production took itself more seriously than the other. London made some subtle changes that tightened the show and toned down a few moments, but it was the smaller theatre and FAR superior casting that made a world of difference. If anything, London had the slightly more serious tone if only because they had an actress who could better deliver the range and poignancy of the character.
With all due respect how can Ragtime and Legally Blonde be put in the same stratosphere?? Oh, good Lord, they are both Broadway musicals, so they are in the same "stratosphere". And the only mention was that they both could have benefited from smaller productions than their originals (with which I completely agree).
I agree that the show is witty as well as entertaining. And after seeing it reach its potential in London, deserves to become a classic. And if you have a problem with plot holes in musical comedy, then you have to disregard 90% of the classics in Broadway history.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Updated On: 11/6/12 at 04:18 PM