#276
Posted: 5/11/08 at 1:09am
Lovesclasssics, I saw the 2007 tour of Camelot (with Micheal York), and agree that if anyone can rival Julie Andrews, it has to be Rachel York. What a performance! And her voice was perfect for the role. Too bad this was not done in Broadway also, as she would have been nominated for a Tony.
I had never seen Camelot before, so I had nothing to compare it to, so I enjoyed and liked it very much. Granted that Michael might have been a little too old for Genevieve, but you forgot about it halfway through the play, as he really exerted this boyishness and exuberance in his role--even his weak point, the singing, was acceptable.
And, then there was James Barbour. His acting (at least when I saw it), was not quite up there with the performances he has given in the past;I think this due to what we all know he was going through then. However, when he sang, no Lancelot could have been better suited--he rocked the house, and they all received standing ovations at the end. I have to say that in some of the scenes, he did a pretty convincing job. It is too bad that he seemed so down trodden (I imagine he was on and off like this throughout the tour...if anyone saw him, maybe they can commnent on this).
That said, I think this Lerner and Loewes' revival is really a charming take on Camelot.
BTW, sorry to hear Gabriel was not all there--from the reviews, it seems he still charmed the pants off the critics, though (?)
I had never seen Camelot before, so I had nothing to compare it to, so I enjoyed and liked it very much. Granted that Michael might have been a little too old for Genevieve, but you forgot about it halfway through the play, as he really exerted this boyishness and exuberance in his role--even his weak point, the singing, was acceptable.
And, then there was James Barbour. His acting (at least when I saw it), was not quite up there with the performances he has given in the past;I think this due to what we all know he was going through then. However, when he sang, no Lancelot could have been better suited--he rocked the house, and they all received standing ovations at the end. I have to say that in some of the scenes, he did a pretty convincing job. It is too bad that he seemed so down trodden (I imagine he was on and off like this throughout the tour...if anyone saw him, maybe they can commnent on this).
That said, I think this Lerner and Loewes' revival is really a charming take on Camelot.
BTW, sorry to hear Gabriel was not all there--from the reviews, it seems he still charmed the pants off the critics, though (?)