"What kind of accent do the leads use? I know Sierra and Ramin are from North America, so..."
SIerra does an English accent (very well, actually) but her character hardly has any speaking lines in the entire show. When she sings she sounds American.
Ramin is American through and through.
Meg character is speaks American.
Her mom, Madamme Giry, has more of a german accent (or something like that).
The child and Raoul have English accents both in speaking and in singing.
And all the supporting cast have fake, irritating, American accents. The really nasal "gosh, golly" kind.
Official pictures of productions are traditionally held back until the official opening night of a show. (Most producers will hand these out complimentary to the audience that night- not done as often as it used to be I must admit!) This publishing sometimes slips and they wont appear until up to a few weeks after the show is open.
Hi I'm new to Broadwayworld.com. I have been enjoying reading everyone's opinion on Love Never Dies and reading spoilers about the show. Just curious... how is Ramin and Sierra's chemistry? I've seen the videos on the Love Never Dies website and they have great chemistry offstage, but how is the chemistry onstage? Also, in the show are there any intimate moments between the Phantom and Christine?
True, to untrained eyes a lot of West End programs could be seen as brochures I suppose and some actually (annoyingly!) are a mix of the two!!! This production, however, is guaranteed to have a pretty sumptuous one after March 9th.
Was my 3rd time seeing Phantom this afternoon, really enjoyed it once again. The restricted view stalls seats are really good value for £25. 90% visibility I would say :)
Ok so Love Never Dies!! I actually LOVED it. I can see how some people might not like it but the score, set, acting, orchestrations go together so well and I really really loved it. I disagree about the prologue being too long, I think it sets the scene really well. There are afew pointless numbers (like bathing beauty) and I never want to hear the word "Beautiful" sung in a musical ever again, but apart from that the score is brilliant. Very good mix of sounds.
Set wise I thought it worked very well. I liked it being quite blank at the end when they are just on the pier.
*SPOILER*
They could maybe tighten up the final scene where Christine dies. It takes so long for her to actually just die and she seems to do it at such a dramatically convenient moment.
"Hi I'm new to Broadwayworld.com. I have been enjoying reading everyone's opinion on Love Never Dies and reading spoilers about the show. Just curious... how is Ramin and Sierra's chemistry? I've seen the videos on the Love Never Dies website and they have great chemistry offstage, but how is the chemistry onstage? Also, in the show are there any intimate moments between the Phantom and Christine?"
I thought their chemistry was really good. They have great intimate duet together on a balcony set.
I have just got back to Manchester after seeing this evening's (yesterday evening's) performance of Love Never Dies. Forgive me if the review is somewhat oddly written. I have just had a four hour bus journey, and am knackered!
I am an ALW fan for the most part, so was hugely looking forward to the follow up to what I consider his greatest show. I am still to come to a definite decision about LND, although I am leaning towards a positive reaction!
The score is fantastic. Despite the expected hints from WIW, Sunset etc, ALW really comes up with the goods on this show, especially through the use of repeated themes etc, which are perfectly suited to the show. As has been previously said, 'Til I Hear You Sing is one of the best numbers in the show, and Ramin performs brilliantly, as does Sierra with Love Never Dies itself, which was framed musically by the Devil Takes the Hindmost quartet, which for me, was the musical highlight of the evening. The musical quotations from Phantom of the Opera are wonderful, and you can feel the audience's excitement at recognising strains of Prima Donna, and Little Lotte.
Aspects of the design were equally stunning - the opening set of the pier was fantastic, as was Christine's hotel room. However, the I felt that the design completely lacked a sense of cohesion, and the images seen in the Telegrah (at least I think it was the Telegraph) did not transfer well to the stage. Elements of the design looked cheap and thrown together, particularly the Phantasma curved backdrop panels, which just looked dull and two dimensional. Considering Bob Crowley's other work, I was slightly disappointed.
The Performances are phenomenal, almost without exception.
The opening needs tightening, and work on diction. None of us could understand a word of Niamh Perry's opening lines. It just sounded like mumble, and was completely lost on us. Similarly, the arrival of Christine, Raoul and Gustave needs tightening and a more clear aim for the scene. The use of the three 'freaks' was, in my view, somewhat pointless, as they did not have developed personalities at all, and were just tools of the Phantom. Nice costumes, apart for the one dressed as the Child-Catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. God knows.
Meg is dying for an aria, and further character development. **SPOILER** Her main songs in the show are upbeat, cheery fluff, and she seemingly quickly turns into a gun-wielding, child-drowning nutter. If they spent more time on the psychological effect of the Phantom on Meg, it would make more sense, and be more plausible.
The ending is long and drawn out, as they end up playing a game of hug-the-corpse, shortly followed by a game of stroke-the-face. Speed it up. End it sooner. People were getting bored, and waiting for the show to end. When it finally did end, as others have mentioned, there was little signal that the show had reached it's conclusion. Any Ideas?
Raoul at one point dresses almost exactly as Joe Gillis from Sunset. Bizarre.
The oddest part of the show for me was the end of Act 1, and the Beauty Underneath sequence. Musically, I enjoyed it. Visually, it was bizarre, and at points, disturbing. The Automatons are unnecessarily bizarre, and even for the Phantom, probably in very bad taste. There is some kind of skeletal drumming machine, which just looks like a four-armed zombie behind a minibar. Strange.
Gustave needs a personality, please. At the moment, he is just a generic child.
Despite these criticisms, I was far more impressed with the show than I thought I would be, and I think that what I have highlighted, although they are only my personal views, would be easily corrected and tweaked. I think if the creative team made some of these changes, the show would be really fantastic.
I will watch with interest to see what happens. Hopefully, changes will be made, and the show will enjoy a decent run.
Watched the interview with Jonathan Ross with the Lord last night and ALW revealed "he was conscious not to use any material from 'Phantom of the Opera'", do you feel this is right?
I feel he could use a little bit, for instance he could of used a couple of verses from 'The Music of the Night'.
In two minds about it...For it ranged from totally negative to totally positive! Every postive has a negative to it.
The score is possibly one of ALW best since Sunset, but as a complete show the score is too downbeat with only one (and the probably the worst song) being upbeat which is Bathing Beauty. The song Beautiful Thing is trying so hard to be Phantom electic rock style which just stuck out in the show like a sore thumb. However Once Upon Another Time, Love Never Dies, Old Friend (quite sondheim esq) and Til I Hear You Song are real high lights.
This show is quite small really with not a huge cast and most times only having 4-6 people on stage, the show could have worked better on a much small stage.
The set, direction and choregraphy I was most disappointed with. I thought I was going to be transported to Coney Island in the early 20th century but I got terrible projects and about 5 people on stage doing some tricks. The projects worked at time but other times, again, were crineg worth, the balloon scene was possibly the most tackiest thing I have seen since the Woman in White and Maria friedman trying run up the stairs in time with the projection!
Also the setting was never properly introduced - I don't recall their being any mention to where Chistine is actually performing at. In the book it was a grand opening of a new Opera House, but the grand finale song show down I had no idea where I was supposed to be.
The set at times was good, the peir and backstage were great but the Phantoms space reminded me of Carousel when they he dies! Infact I wondered if they had borrowed those awful projections from the recent Carousel revival for the show!
The cast - Ramin is brilliant, the boy (Goustave) has great, Summer I thought struggled to play a slightlier nastier character and Sierrahe I thought good but easily forgetful. She sings and acts well but its no star performance or presence. Liz was the only personal I thought really commanded the stage.
The ending did have me in tears and worked very well.
Overall I enjoyed it but just felt like it was an average follow on. I don't think this was the right director or production team, dear I say, Trevor Nunn could have been better as we needed to see more on these characters and focus in much more on the time and setting - more money needed to thrown at it for the set and cast team - far too bare, I didn't get transported to that time and the thing with the Phantom is that you get transported to that Opera House in Paris straight away and get wrapped up in the whole love feel. I wanted to get wrapped up in thrill of this book and setting of Coney Island but there was just no suspence, except for the ending which worked because there was no dry eye!
I wouldn't say to ANYONE to pay a ticket at full price to see as sadly it is not worth it - and you'd be better off seeing the original. Howevee for those who love the Phantom, the characters and are intrequed to see it, go and make your own mind up, but don't be expected to be blown away but to hear a few lovely songs, some great scenes and few clever tricks.