In other words, if Mame premiered today with someone as perfect for the role and with the same degree of box office power as Lansbury had then, it would be a success. The same goes for a revival. Except that musically and dramatically, MAME was very much of its time. Although musical theater fans may cherish the score, none of its songs really became standards, not even the title number.
And Auntie Mame is in every scene after the Prologue.
I'm not sure you revive MAN OF LA MANCHA without a well-known lead, but I certainly don't see a starless MAME.
Celeste Holm (vacation), Jane Morgan, Ann Miller, Janis Paige and Sheila Smith (vacation) all played Mame on Broadway. The Ann Miller tour did particularly well and business picked up when she came to New York; alas, her run there ended when somebody dropped a sand-bag on her head. (She recovered.)
I don't know why we're talking about Lady Gaga. For what? The 2030 revival?
It may seem easier to age somebody on stage, but it rarely works for extended musical roles. Mame's big dance number ("That's How Young I Feel") comes when she is in her 50s. Are you going to tell your 35-year-old actress to limp a little?
(I assume it's obvious I'm responding to several different posts here and not just to henrik.)
BTW, I don't know if they offered the role at Goodspeed to any true stars last year; but when they got down to the final choices, they were all 50ish women whom theater people would know but who were not stars on the level of Cher or Streep.
Updated On: 12/30/12 at 03:17 PM