Musicals and masculinity — Page 4
Posted: 9/8/05 at 12:01pm
Posted: 9/8/05 at 12:26pm
Threads like these where straight boys are making sure the rest of BWW knows they aren't a fag for liking theatre are borderline offensive without the discussion that has been taking place that you are objecting to.
Yes, at the end of the day, we can all laugh at stereotypes. But, the reverence required seems to be lacking.
Updated On: 9/8/05 at 12:26 PM
Posted: 9/8/05 at 1:04pm
Posted: 9/8/05 at 1:13pm
Posted: 9/8/05 at 1:25pm
And, this isn't the first thread to discuss this matter, so I admit that my comments and feelings on the subject are cumulative from prior discussions.
Hence, there's nothing wrong with me thank you.
Updated On: 9/8/05 at 01:25 PM
Posted: 9/8/05 at 1:28pm
Thank you as well.
Posted: 9/8/05 at 1:33pm
So, back off.
Posted: 9/8/05 at 1:34pm
Posted: 9/8/05 at 1:42pm
So we are even.
Updated On: 9/8/05 at 01:42 PM
Posted: 9/8/05 at 1:49pm
I think it's wrong to call the theatre feminine--it's both feminine and masculine. I think straight men and women can be feminine and masculine. I think gay men and women can be feminine and masculine. And, I abhor when people take the perceived stereotype and make it the rule. And, then guys feel like they have to make sure the world knows they aren't a fudgepacker because they like WICKED and WEST SIDE STORY. It's borderline offensive. Who cares? Grow a spine and be yourself is all I'm saying.
Posted: 9/8/05 at 3:36pm
Posted: 9/8/05 at 4:17pm
Posted: 9/8/05 at 4:21pm
Posted: 9/9/05 at 1:51am
"I think it's wrong to call the theatre feminine--it's both feminine and masculine." As are sports.
Why are we trying to define everything?
Posted: 9/9/05 at 2:10am
Posted: 9/9/05 at 2:27am
Sorry--but I don't have a homosexual or gay lifestyle. None of us gays do. We have the same lifestyle straight people have--we just happen to date or have sex with people of the same sex.
I don't think you are a bigot. But, I do think there are some icky ideas in this thread.
You ask, "Why are we trying to define everything?" Well, that is exactly what my statements don't do. They represent inclusive ideals.
Posted: 9/9/05 at 2:48am
Perhaps because this thread started with someone worrying that his love of musical theatre would cast aspersions on his "masculinity" (which, as been discussed ad nauseam, is exclusive neither to heterosexuality or homosexuality).
Even if he had said it cast aspersions on his heterosexuality, I can see why it would be a topic for discussion.
I guess it's all relative. I always thought there was some basis for truth in this stereotype because, apart from my father (who actually helped foster my love of musical theatre), I've met far more gay men than straight men who really loved musicals.
And we can all pat ourselves on the back when we post on this board, but the fact is there is still a huge anti-gay bias in this country (I do realize the original poster is from London, but I'm just going with what I know) and it's not gonna change until people just get the hell over it.
How do we get the hell over it? I'm not quite sure, though I'm willing to make a few suggestions (some of which have mentioned before, on this thread and others)
1. Stop immediately equating homosexuality with femininity.
2. By extension, stop equating femininity with something that is somehow lesser than masculinity.
3. Realize there is no more of a "gay lifestyle" than there is "straight lifestyle."
4. Accept that there's always gonna be someone who thinks that liking musicals is "gay."
5. If you're straight, realize that it's not the worst thing in the world to be thought of as gay. By all means, assert your heterosexuality if it comes into question, but also question why you yourself are associating with someone who makes a huge deal out of it.
6. Finally, if you're gay, please please please stop using the term "straight-acting." It's demeaning to you and every other gay out there, and it's also a complete crock. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but if you've had another man inside of you (or vice versa), that's about as far from "straight"-acting as you can get.
Grr. I've run out of steam. Ditto what Jerby said.
Updated On: 9/9/05 at 02:48 AM
Posted: 9/9/05 at 5:00am
I heart you.
Posted: 9/9/05 at 12:09pm
Totally agree.
I used the phrase "lifestyle" incorrectly. I apoligize.
I am not your enemy, though, guys. Pick your battles wisely.
Posted: 9/9/05 at 12:39pm
I just think the passionate reactions on this thread show that it is a deeply personal and non-casual issue.
Posted: 9/9/05 at 12:51pm
Posted: 9/9/05 at 1:46pm
"Posted On:9/9/05 at 12:39 PM
You are not our enemy--but the ignorance out there in society and on this board is.
I just think the passionate reactions on this thread show that it is a deeply personal and non-casual issue. "
Honestly speaking, aren't you the one who passionately reacted to this post. Don't you agree? Yeah, that reaction is deeply personal and non-casual issue, IMO.
I don't hate gay. But I hate someone who bring his own bitterness to everything. I prefer discussing things as it is, cannot appreciate the attitude to bring in personal problem into a topic that is not directly related.
Updated On: 9/9/05 at 01:46 PM
Posted: 9/9/05 at 1:51pm
to all those guys complaining about gay bashing or whatever, it could be worse.
i come from mexico, and sexuality is a SERIOUSLY taboo topic, to the extent that gay man (or women) are not allowed to say they're gay. at all. universities will put on any show regardless of it's content, as long as it doesn't have any gay material in it (rent is thus, VERY taboo). in mexico calling someone gay is a serious insult.
be glad in america you have the freedom to be straight or gay as you please. i think in many ways, all cultures are the same and stem from the same place. the way things are in mexico is the way things were in the US a long time ago. be patient and wait for that "negative" attitude towards gay people to dissappear.
to the london boy, i understood what you meant about masculinity. i struggle with my femininity alot, because i refuse to be the stupid, submissive, giggly, bambi-eyed "woman" my culture expects me to be.
Posted: 9/9/05 at 6:19pm
Intended or not, this thread has brought a lot of other long-held misconceptions up, such as that gay automatically means "feminine" and that there's one "gay lifestyle." I realize people just parrot expressions they've heard and often no malice is intended, but even when those thoughts have been recanted or re-expressed, the original thoughts are still out there, and it's clear that for a lot of straight people (on this board and beyond) being called "gay" isn't something they can just shrug off. They've got to repeatedly look for "reassurance." If you are a man and you know you like musical theatre and you know you are sexually attracted to women, what more reassurance do you really need?
imagine if you were gay and got teased by your gay friends about being straight all the time.
I understand the point you are making wickedkiwi, but I'm not sure it's the same thing. When a straight person teases another straight person about being gay, it's generally to cast dispersions on their heterosexuality, because the implicit notion is that being gay is a negative thing. And that's something with which society still continues to beat us over the head.
You don't hear much about people being beaten, fired, losing their homes or their lives for being straight. I've never walked out of a midwestern straight bar and seen a bunch of drunken gays in a pick-up truck, waiting for a straight person to harass. I live in state in which over 70% of its voters voted to pass a constitutional amendment to deny me the right to marry whom I choose, something I was already able to do.
As long as straight people need reassurance of their heterosexuality at the expense of those of us are gay, all of this is directly related.
Updated On: 9/9/05 at 06:19 PM
BroadwayWorld TV