bear88 said: "This extension adds a complication to my May trip, which is none of your concerns. But my question is this: Most of the comments and reviews I have seen basically say Cranston is fantastic but the play, overall, is nothing special aside from a few directorial flourishes.
Is that a fair assessment? And if it's unfair to the play, why is it worth choosing aside from Cranston?"
If you don't see Network, what would that open up as other options? Too hard to parse whether you'll get enough from Cranston to justify seeing the show, heh.
But I think there are parts of the show that didn't age as well (Maslany and Goldwyn's roles), and the whole staging is immersive and interesting, but yeah, you leave thinking Wow, Cranston really nailed it...