"Melinda's interpolated songs have nothing to do with her character or any dramatic situation in the show, and are completely generic - they could as easily and pointlessly be sung by anybody, anywhere."
And that's the problem with comparisons to CRAZY FOR YOU (or the modern versions of ANYTHING GOES and BABES IN ARMS, that also rely heavily on interpolations). Gershwin, Porter and Rodgers & Hart wrote in a period when songs were written in the author's voice, not the character's. So interpolating songs from other shows by the same writers often works very well.
(ETA Whizzer's point about CRAZY FOR YOU above had to do with audience expectations, not interpolations. I wasn't responding to him here, but it might appear I was misrepresenting what he said. I regret my lack of clarity.)
However slight its plot, CLEAR DAY is from a different era, when Rodgers & Hammerstein had changed the "rules" by writing each song in the voice of the character. This isn't to say interpolation is impossible, but I'm not surprised by After Eight's objections. Frankly, I wouldn't expect songs from movie musicals to blend with the original score.
(Comparisons to CABARET and other later musicals influenced by Brecht are equally problematic for different reasons.)
***
As for not inviting the workshop audience to a post-show discussion, I have attended countless such sessions and have yet to hear a constructive criticism. How an audience responds during the performance is one (often valuable) thing; what audience members THINK is the problem is another. It's a rare viewer (even including people from the industry) who is qualified to discuss a show after one viewing.
(ETA2: obviously, we all discuss shows after a single viewing. What I should have said was "immediately after a single viewing without time for reflection.")
But speaking of the workshop, I thought I read pages ago that "When I'm Being Born Again" was cut. What is the narrative context for it in the adaptation?
Updated On: 11/21/11 at 02:54 PM