Somethingwicked, the script may list Polly as possibly in her late 50s, but if she were that young in 2004, when the play takes place, and if she had been at least in her mid 30s when the backstory took place (as young as she could have possibly been at the time given she had by then had a fairly successful screenwriting career followed by parenting three children the oldest of whom was at least 16 at the time of the backstory), then the backstory would have happened at approximately 1980.
I got the impression the backstory happened much earlier, during the height of the youth counterculture in California. Isn't the period in question framed in reference to the hippies, Manson and Viet Nam?
Maybe my math is wrong or I'm failing to understand the reference points, but I assumed Polly would have been around 35 in the late 60s or early 70s.
Isn't Polly and Silda's writing career referenced as being in the 1960s. If Polly were in her late 50s in 2004, she would have been born around 1945 at the earliest. She and Silda's referenced 1960s writing career is followed by her having her oldest son roughy in 1965, at the very earliest, and probably at least a few years later. If he were born in 1965, that would make him only 15 in 1980. And isn't her back story meeting with Nancy Reagan well before Nancy became first lady?
If Silda were in her late 40s in 2004, she would have been born around 1957. How could a woman born in 1957 have been a working Hollywood screenwriter in the 1960s?
I have a similar issue with Violet Weston being in her mid 60s, as that script may also indicate. How could she be only in her 60s if she were a member of "the greatest generation?" That would mean she would have been born shortly after World War II, not been a member of the generation that won it.
Updated On: 4/28/12 at 12:21 PM