JennH said: "^^^ I applaud S.K. for taking measures, drastic though they were, because it's proof that it worked/is working. Some semblance of normalcy is restored. And I want to get through this mess as quickly as thenext person does.However, I'm not a fan of privacy invasion. I don't think privacy and public health needto be on unequal footing, we can care about both equally and get things done without invading privacy. Just like closure and "stay at home" measures, privacy laws serve a purpose too. They keep tyranny at bay. I might have to ask my cousin who lives there what he thought of their measures from a privacy POV, because thoughthe measures worked,I question the privacy aspect. And if I haven't made it clear on other threads, I DETEST most current U.S. leadership, particularly thefederal level. Some state/local leaders have done better, but I'm not a real fan of anyone. But "never waste a crisis" and "sacrificing liberty for security" are still timeless truths for a reason. And I'll make something else clear...I'm not "tin foil hat", I know those people who parrot not taking the future vaccine because it'll inject you with chip tech, this was faked (these people literally ask if anyone actually knows anyone who's contracted this...), etc,you know the ones. And I want to smack them all.But that doesn't mean one can't/shouldn't be wary of potential power grabs. This applies to both "sides" and every move they both make need close examining."
Tell that to all the people who DIED because some people are unwilling for temporally forgo their civil liberties. In times like this, all the talks of human rights must be put behind the ultimate human right—the right to LIVE. They are otherwise bull**** if people are dying left and right.