Pulizer Prize for Drama - 2011

[CapnHook]

Posted: 11/5/11 at 11:25pm

STRONG contenders this year. Rather exciting.

- GOOD PEOPLE by David Lindsay-Abaire
- BENGAL TIGER AT THE BAGHDAD ZOO by Rajiv Joseph
- THE MOTHERF*CKER WITH THE HAT by Stephen Adly Guirgis
- OTHER DESERT CITIES by Jon Robin Baitz
- SONS OF THE PROPHET by Stephen Karam

Until OTHER DESERT CITIES, I thought GOOD PEOPLE was the frontrunner.

Am I forgetting any other strong contenders?

[WhizzerMarvin]

Posted: 11/5/11 at 11:27pm

If I'm not mistaken Bengal Tiger was already a finalist last year.

[CapnHook]

Posted: 11/5/11 at 11:39pm

Whoops! It was a finalist two years ago. I forgot about that.

[bwayfan7000]

Posted: 11/5/11 at 11:43pm

The first thing I thought after I saw Good People was that it had Pulitzer written all over it. I very much hope it wins.

[defyingravity11]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 1:03am

I'm crossing my fingers for Good People! Does anyone know if The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs is eligible?

[Bettyboy72]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 1:18am

Good People deserves the win. It is beautifully written and far superior to Other Desert Cities.

[CockeyedOptimist2]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 1:47am

Motherf**ker was an enjoyable and entertaining show to watch, but I wouldn't think that it's well written enough to score even a finalist spot for Pulitzer consideration. I vote "Good People" but haven't seen "Other Desert Cities" yet. Hopefully soon!

[AC126748]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 7:58am

I would add Bathsheba Doran's KIN and Amy Herzog's 4000 MILES to the list of likely contenders.

[MadonnaMusical]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 10:56am

KIN was terrible.... and Bengal Tiger was robbed... lol.

What about Venus in Fur? was that submitted last year? The play that I thought had Pulitzer written all over it was Gruesome Playground Injuries... but I think I was the only one that liked it. lol. Oh well. MTC has a strong history of pulitzer winners so Good People is a safe choice, especially since we know the Pulitzer committee loves him.

[AC126748]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:03am

KIN should almost certainly be on the committee's radar; it was a hit with critics, and they're the ones who award the prizes. I'm fairly certain VENUS IN FUR was already considered, and even if it hasn't yet been, it's hard to imagine the committee viewing so slight a work as worthy of the prize.

[orangeskittles]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:12am

It's actually 2012. 2011 was Clybourne Park. It's by awarded year, not eligibility year.

The Book of Mormon. Anyone objecting: See 2010 winner

Updated On: 11/6/11 at 11:12 AM

[PiraguaGuy2]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:14am

Yeah, I would not be surprised if The Book of Mormon was a finalist, although Good People looks like it will take it.

[AC126748]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:15am

The Book of Mormon. Anyone objecting: See 2009 winner

I was actually thinking it might have a shot, too. They also recently shortlisted IN THE HEIGHTS.

[Mister Matt]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:22am

Any Off-Broadway or regional standouts? Clyboune Park won without yet having a Broadway production. I enjoyed Good People, but I didn't think it was an extraordinary play.

[orangeskittles]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:24am

Heh, I just realized I made the same mistake I was correcting.

See 2010 winner!

[AC126748]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:26am

Sons of the Prophet, Kin, 4000 Miles, By the Way Meet Vera Stark...they could also be possibilities. Also, The Whipping Man was quite good, but that play's been kicking around for a while, and I'm not sure if it's already been considered.

Anybody know of good regional prospects? DETROIT was nominated last year, and BENGAL TIGER was two years before it hit Broadway.

[GlindatheGood22]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 4:29pm

I thoroughly enjoyed Good People, but the award belongs to Sons of the Prophet. Best new American play since August: Osage County.

[Unknown User]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 5:24pm

I really want Sons of the Prophet to be a finalist.

[TheHappyPhantom]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 7:50pm

Book of Mormon would be a cool thing to see win... so much more deserving than Next to Normal. They lost my respect when they awarded that.

[showchoirguy]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 8:15pm

"Book of Mormon would be a cool thing to see win... so much more deserving than Next to Normal. They lost my respect when they awarded that."

...how?

[CapnHook]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 8:19pm

"Book of Mormon would be a cool thing to see win... so much more deserving than Next to Normal. They lost my respect when they awarded that."

After reading the first sentence, I thought you were being sarcastic. After reading the second sentence, I think you have poor taste in musical theatre.

[SondheimFan5]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 9:19pm

The Book of Mormon is hysterical. Probably one of the funniest shows I've seen in years. But it is not Pulitzer material. It's nothing new or innovative. The lyrics are funny but they're not particularly clever. The songs are OK but they're really not all that memorable aside from a few; there were definitely better overall scores last season (Women on the Verge, Catch Me). I think the Pulitzer committee would lose the respect of many people if Mormon makes the shortlist or wins.

[TheHappyPhantom]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:25pm

I'm not saying Mormon should win...but if it made the short list, as no other musical has a chance this year, I think it would say a lot towards the level of talent that went into the writing for that show, as it is the most successful (artistically and financially)show to hit Bway in a long time. I don't know Woman on the Verge, but Catch Me was flat and forgettable. As for Next to Normal, it was unbearably awful. Amateurishly written book, a thoughtlessly written score full of inconsistent rhymes, not well personalized to the characters,no distinctive songs, and full of cliches. For it and Sunday in the Park with George to have anything in common is an insult.

[michellek45]

Posted: 11/6/11 at 11:54pm

The Book of Mormon should not be anywhere near this award. When I think of Pulitzer Prizewinners, I think of plays/musicals that either give words/life to the types of things we all have felt but couldn't quite express, innovate the form somehow, or provoke thought. The Book of Mormon did none of those things. In fact, to me, it seemed to stifle thought with the ending. Everything was cured by Mormons! Crazy war generals totally surrender to fairytales about Star Trek! Aren't Mormons awesome? It was way too neat of an ending, and that was where the show lost any sort of "subversive" vibe it might have had going for it. Did I laugh? Yes. Did I enjoy myself? Yes. Did I think it deserved the Tony, let alone the Pulitzer? No chance in hell.

[pinoyidol2006]

Posted: 11/7/11 at 12:22am

I thought Mormon definitely deserved the Tony compared to its competition. I don't think it deserves the Pulitzer prize, though.

@michelle: I don't think BoM is as shallow as you made it seem. I was raised Mormon, so this show probably had a more profound effect on me than you. I felt that the way they portrayed Elder Price's struggles with faith matched my own, so I'm biased.

I also think it's a good story about friendship. But not good enough to deserve a Pulitzer.

Updated On: 11/7/11 at 12:22 AM