RENT Film Onto DVD Feb 21 - Artwork & Specs Released! — Page 2
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:29pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:30pm
Kringas - I don't think more people are going to be buying the DVD because Rosario and Taye are on the spine. If they like Rosario and Taye and are going to buy a DVD just because their favorite actor is on the spine, I think that is absurd. I can understand if they get more publicity to sell the DVD in Ads, promos, and TV spots (if any), but how does having their picture on the spine help publicity? It really isn't fair to the other cast members.
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:31pm
I like that idea alot. :)
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:32pm
it would look really awesome with all black for the background, though.
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:35pm
I don't think many people who haven't already seen it are going to be buying the dvd period, but that's just me. It doesn't matter what seems fair and what doesn't. It's the way it goes with publicity. If Idina becomes a huge Hollywood star someday, then when the dvd is rereleased, she'll be the focus of the publicity.
And frankly, it's a tiny picture on the spine of a dvd. I doubt any of them really protest the "unfairness" of it.
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:38pm
Extremely amateurish. Makes the whole film look like a cheap low budget release. Did Sony hire a 5 year old with an endless supply of Crayola crayons to design this? I know that what's important is what's on the discs but they could have at least made that cover more pleasing to the eye.
Updated On: 1/9/06 at 05:38 PM
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:41pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:43pm

terrible artwork.
the only artwork surrounding the film i have liked is the cover of the highlights cds.
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:44pm
Also you guys, that's the 2 DVD set--usually single DVD and 2 DVD cases for movies are diferent. I'm sure there will be another cover on the outside of it (probably the main RENT poster outside of movie theaters).
That's just my guess though.
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:45pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:49pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:51pm
I agree with kyle.
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:55pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:56pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:57pm
luckydaves cover idea would have been classy and beautiful.
they are OBVIOUSLY going for the complete opposite.
but look on the bright side, the crappy cover represents the crappy film thats inside the cover very nicely! points for that!!!!!!!!!
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:57pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:59pm
Updated On: 1/9/06 at 05:59 PM
Posted: 1/9/06 at 5:59pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 6:00pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 6:01pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 6:06pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 6:07pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 6:13pm
Posted: 1/9/06 at 6:15pm
Also, I'm surprised that Ebert & Roeper are on it since they didn't give a great review... actually they gave a pretty rotten one... they should have had a quote from the NY Times instead.
BroadwayWorld TV