SIDE SHOW Reviews — Page 7

^ Got it. 1303 is just slightly above what a mid sized theatre seats. I think that even if were playing a house like the Brooks Atkinson or Nederlander, it would still struggle to find an audience.

---

And I say the St. James was the only theater available and offered to the production at the time the director and the DC Cast was available.

People: you can't just pick a time and theater for anytime you want.

I guess that's why people play fantasy football.

Saw it last night- and it was really good- I cannot understand how anyone could see this show and not love it. I read many of the reviews of this show early in its run, and many of the posters almost had me canceling my plans to see it- what a mistake that would have been. The show is very good- the music, dancing, the story, the acting- all excellent. Maybe not in a class with Kinky Boot or Beautiful- but a very entertaining evening- and the story and some of the music is quite memorable. SEE IT if you get the opportunity.

Did any one see Megan McGinnis the other day when she went on for Erin Davie?

---

On a Thursday night, the orchestra was pretty full- and the balcony had a lot of empties. I know that word of mouth will not fill the seats if people simply do not want to give it a try- I was referring to the negative reviews on THIS site- read the first few pages- and how I was discouraged by the reviews on THIS site- everyone is certainly entitled to their own POV, but I wanted to assure people that the show is excellent. Will it run through Tony awards time- actually, not promising considering the weekly grosses- quite poor- if it closes in January, that would not surprise me.

Was at the matinee today. Very full. Mezz almost full! Great news

Bruce if you are going to talk about 'Side Show' that is fine but disclosure on who you are is important. Your opinion cannot be subjective

Bruce,I dont think it's that much of a secret who you are and I always enjoy reading your posts about Side Show since you are well connected and have factual information to share, rather than rumor and conjecture that comes from other posters. I'm a big fan of the show and have been since 1997 so I am thrilled to hear that audience size appears to be increasing! Oh, and if anyone wants me to reveal my true identity, just let me know

NewBe: love that you joined just today. Just for this? I'm so happy. And since you know me, who are you? Would love to chat in person.

Just curious are there any upcoming dates Megan is scheduled to go on?

I saw the show last night (Sat., Dec. 6).

I very much wanted to see the original Broadway production, had an opportunity to do so, and passed because I thought it would run longer given the reviews. This time I didn't make the same mistake, and I was not disappointed.

While there are flaws in the show--the second act drags at times and some of the lyrics are treacly--I thought it was powerful and emotionally overwhelming. Of course, the heart of the show is the sisters, and Emily Padgett and Megan McGinnis were simply terrific in the roles--superbly acted, deeply affecting performances. And their singing was out this world; the two big ballads ("Who Will Love Me As I Am?" and "I Will Never Leave You") brought the house down.

The supporting players were also very fine, including Robert Joy (as the evil Sir) and David St. Louis (who has a power-house voice) as Jake. The artists who designed and executed the "freak" make-up and the wigs and the costume designer also contributed greatly to the success of the show.

In thirty-plus years of New York theater-going, I've seen hundreds of Broadway shows, and it's easy to get jaded about seeing yet another musical. But I really felt an emotional connection to this show that unfortunately happens less and less frequently. So it's great to see a performance that, every once in a while, reminds me of why I have spent so much of my time (and cold hard cash) doing this.

Updated On: 12/7/14 at 10:52 AM

Wondering why Megan is on again...is Erin Davie sick?

---