"I think it is criminal that B'way cannot support a Pulitzer prize winning play."
1) Pulitzers are awarded by a small group of journalists, none of whom are any more expert in theatre than several posters on this site. A Pulitzer is nice to have, but it doesn't confer any additional "quality" to a play/musical.
2) "B'way" has supported quite a number of Pulitzer winners, beginning with Why Marry? in 1918, which ran 120 performances (at a time when a play could easily turn a profit in a few months), and including hits such as Beyond The Horizon, Anna Christie, They Knew What They Wanted, The Green Pastures, Of Thee I Sing, Idiot's Delight, You Can't Take It With You, Harvey, South Pacific, The Heidi Chronicles, Lost In Yonkers, Angels in America, Rent, and a recent show called Hamilton.
3) When Broadway drifted toward appealing to a mass market of tourists, however, plays became scarcer there - face it, most tourists come to New York for fun, not to "think" (I've actually heard that said by out of town friends, unironically), and so they choose musicals for their fare. It's rare that a play turns a profit on Broadway now (as compared to pre-television days, when many plays could make a profit).
So thinking that "B'way" has some sort of obligation to turn any play that wins a rather arbitrary award into a profit maker really just doesn't make sense. Sweat got a lot of visibility, and will have a strong life for the next few years in regional theatres. And if Ms. Nottage's priority is making money, perhaps she will receive an offer to write for TV (it looks like she's already headed that way, with a show based on Spike Lee's She's Gotta Have It). Because every playwright knows that there's not a great deal of money for them in the theatre.
Updated On: 6/14/17 at 08:54 AM