She stopped the show during Rose's Turn! — Page 4
Posted: 1/11/09 at 6:00am
In GYPSY, she is known to have disliked Sandra Church and I guess the feeling was mutual. However, she got along very well with Jack Klugman. And during rehearsals, Stephen Sondheim said that she was very cooperative. In the recent biography by Brian Kellow, there was no mention of such dislike except toward the end of her life when she was ill and got to be very difficult. Once a diva, always a diva.
Posted: 1/11/09 at 6:17am
Unprofessional of Patti? NOT AT ALL!! (And in a way, sort of in character, considering the legends surrounding the real Madame Rose.)
I find the flashes very distracting and I'm in the audience. On stage it could really throw a performer. Not only that is shows that the people taking the pictures are not "into" the piece but rather souvenir hunters.
I know it won’t happen, but I wish there were an outright BAN on taking cell phones, cameras and recorders into theatre auditoriums.
To be fair, it is rare for a performer to stop a performance over an audience incident. In my 30+ years of theatre going I can recall only twice when a show had to be stopped: URINETOWN on Broadway due to audio problems, and a performance at Shaw Festival when an audience member had a medical problem and had to be taken out.
Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!
I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com
Updated On: 1/11/09 at 06:17 AM
Posted: 1/11/09 at 6:42am
IF THE USHERS WOULD DO THEIR GOD DAMNED JOBS PATTI WOULDN'T HAVE TO DO IT FOR THEM.
I have NEVER ONCE seen an usher remove someone from a theatre for using a phone, or taking pictures, or being disruptive. Ushers these days are a bunch of useless pussies who refuse to take any action. I APPLAUD PATTI FOR STANDING UP FOR HERSELF AND EVERY SINGLE PERFORMER OUT THERE. WHAT THESE PEOPLE DID IS DANGEROUS AND DISRESPECTFUL TO THE PERFORMERS.
Posted: 1/11/09 at 6:50am
Posted: 1/11/09 at 7:15am
She gave the usher three chances to do something. They didn't. Flashes are DANGEROUS. They're distracting and an actor can lose their footing, their process, etc. She had every right to stop if the ushers weren't going to.
I know the woman is a bit dramatic, and sometimes over-reacts, but she wasn't in the wrong here. And frankly, I would've stood up and applauded her for doing what she did had I been there.
Recording of any kind is illegal. The performers and the compers and the creative team lose money because of recordings. It is, I say it again, ILLEGAL.
She was right, guys. Period. And I still love her.
Posted: 1/11/09 at 7:46am
Or, more than likely, is there a double standard for Patti LuPone in which she has 'earned' her right to be unprofessional?
Fair play to her that she said the flash had gone off 3 times, so in effect there were 3 warnings in which nothing was done...but I feel that argument is void because of the amount of times she has done this.
Posted: 1/11/09 at 8:09am
I find it interesting that some of the people who defend her actions against the illegal picture-taker are also the ones who are craving the equally illegal audio clip.
A click for life.
mamie4 5/14/03
Posted: 1/11/09 at 8:18am
Having said that I also find it interesting that some of the ones defending her actions want a bootleg audio of the event. But there is a difference between quietly taping a show and blinding a performer with a flash.
Also it seems that a lot of the people condemning her are the same ones who think it's their right to have pictures taken with the stars after a show and are mad if a star goes out another door or just wants to leave the theatre without signing autographs and fauning over their "fans" .. you know, stage door stalkers.
My personal view though is - Brava Patti!
Updated On: 1/11/09 at 08:18 AM
Posted: 1/11/09 at 8:29am
I dislike falshes in the theatre as much as the next, but to say they danger the performer is ridiculous, name one time an actor was rushed to the hospital due to camera flash accident???
Posted: 1/11/09 at 8:45am
Posted: 1/11/09 at 8:57am
I don't think they are to blame here for being upset for having dished out a lot of money and feeling cheated.
I also don't, however, feel that Ms. LuPone is to blame, either.
I see a lot of Broadway theatre regularly, and this distracting audience behavior is constant.
The house staffs, in general, are incompetent, and they either have not been instructed how to do their jobs properly, or they just don't have the balls to do what they feel, and is, a very difficult task, and that is stopping audience members during a show from using cameras and cell phones that distract the other audience members and the cast.
I blame the house manager and the ushers in this situation. The same goes for the situation where Billy Crystal stopped his show a few years ago after the third cell phone went off.
This isn't just Patti. So don't blame her. She's just an easy target on this board, so when this situation happens with her, all the vultures come immediately out.
House managers and ushers need to be trained and instructed to do their jobs, and stop this behavior immediately, when these situations arise during shows, the FIRST time it happens, so that the actors don't have to do their jobs for them.
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
Posted: 1/11/09 at 8:58am
Yes but you shouldn't be taking a picture anyhow. Live theatre is just that a "live" experience. If you want pictures buy the souvenir program. You want a recording? Buy the CD. You want a video, well admittedly that's more of a problem because most shows do not get taped, but that does not give anyone the right to make their own video of a performance.
Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!
I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:00am
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:01am
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:01am
And I've been the theater plenty of times when ushers have YELLED and TOLD patrons to put away phones, cameras and even LAPTOP computers! (Not kidding, at Boeing,Boening Christmas weekend, a man NEXT to me pulled out his laptop during intermission and fired it up and proceeded to work.
To try to defend the ushers a bit, DURING the show it IS rather difficult for them to do that aspect of their job: FINDING the "perp", communicating to them, REMOVING them and all without bothering the other audience members. Really a no win situation.
The part I find most irritating, is how long it takes folks to actually comply.
Perhaps they need to do more than the "pleasant" announcement at the beginging. You know, like at the movies, they play the vid to be quiet and throw away your garbage. Maybe they should start showing the video of Patti going off as a warning for all!!!
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:01am
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:11am
Ms. Lupone is an actress, not an usher. It may not be exactly the same, but I don't see any ushers stopping a show because a performer is doing a poor job.
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:25am
the stupidity of this statement is astounding.
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:30am
But this post and the one on All That Chat were probably both started by the same poster who started the previous thread here: The "Patti Stopped the Show" Troll.
Updated On: 1/12/09 at 09:30 AM
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:33am
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:35am
Good for her. You don't think if one camera went off and nothing happened that a few other people might have joined in too? Some of the stupid comments in this thread really astound me - but Elke, yours beats them all.
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:40am
Perhaps a similar rule should be invoked here. If people are going to be so shouty and repetitive in the "performers have every right to stop a show if the audience is too distracting!" vs "performers have no right to take the audience out of the moment!" argument EVERY TIME, then it's obviously not a discussion that will ever go anywhere, and therefore isn't going to be very useful on a discussion board.
Ah well. Guess I'll just take the wussy option and not read any of these threads any more. See you in more interesting discussions! ^_^
Posted: 1/11/09 at 9:42am
Posted: 1/11/09 at 10:02am
BroadwayWorld TV