Thank you, Scarywarhol. I took my 12 old to see it at City Opera, and would've taken him a year earlier. We saw the new one last fall, when he was 14, and he only got more out of it. I am startled by the number of posts who suggest it's too complicated. What do you think 14 year olds are reading in school? What do you think they are watching in many of those god-awful PG-13 movies?
What's more critical: Teens need to be exposed to the best of the arts sooner, not later. I have a friend who waited, always "protecting" her daughter from the darker elements in every b'way show (witness, LES MIZ). Of course, she awoke one day with a bland, INCURIOUS 16 year old, who by that point didn't have the attention span, patience, or powers of analysis -- or desire to see plays with her mother.
I shocked friends by taking my son to see THE BEAUTIFUL GAME in London, when he was 10. Guess what? He's the only kid in his peer group who knows bupkus about the Troubles, the IRA, and a piece of contemporary history not covered in this country. My philosophy: aim higher for your kid, not low. Raise the bar, and talk about the show and its themes afterwards. There isn't a magical age when kids will suddenly want to see more demanding fare. Expose 'em early, and they'll come along for the glorious ride.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 2/25/06 at 01:01 PM