StageStruckLad said: "I wonder if the architectural firm that "designed" that Marriott monstrosity now hangs its head in shame? Probably not."
Actually, I'm pretty certain that it was designed by the biggest starchitect of the time (although the term hadn't been invented), John Portman. And I suspect it's a prime part of the firm's portfolio, alongside the Hyatt Embarcadero Center in SF and the Peachtree (something) in Atlanta. It was quite the dazzling accomplishment in its time. And today, provides a prime electric board to Broadway, manages to fit an immense hotel and large theatre into the center of Times Square, and provides another block of pass-through beyond Shubert Alley. Concrete brutalism? Yeah. That's specifically what the style is. I suspect it'll even be trendy in a year or two. To me, the unforgivable design decision is the carpet. Have you seen it? Worse than the worst in Las Vegas.
Yes, I would have LOVED for the old theatres to be retained and I have no great love for the Marquis, although I DO appreciate the leg room. I treasure old theatres, tally the ones I have yet to see (Majestic, Winter Garden, Ambassador, American Airlines) and have joined in the celebration of the reopening of the Curran Theater, here in SF.
Yet, to hear Gerald Schoenfeld (yeah, one of "the lawyers" ) tell the story, either in his own book or Michael Riedel's, times were dire in Times Square. And it's not as if any shows had to wait for a theatre to open up. Many of today's houses were dark for years at a time.
Perhaps, as the destruction of Penn Station paved the way for historic preservation nationwide and the beautiful restoration of Grand Central Terminal, the 1982 massacre paved the way for the protection and celebration of the wonderful (mostly) Broadway houses we know so well today.
(Full disclosure - we've started staying there on our theatre visits because my husband has ambulatory issues and there is literally no more convenient hotel for our shows.)
Updated On: 1/31/17 at 07:37 AM