Last night's performance continues to occupy much of my thoughts…
When I wrote the above post, I had hoped that others who had attended The Hippest Trip, or perhaps company members would respond. Hundreds have read it, but so far no other feedback. So, here is a more detailed breakdown of my thoughts regarding this impressive musical.
Change the name! I suspect that the title comes from the documentary, Soul Train, The Hippest Trip. That title works because it starts with "Soul Train" and so "Hippest Trip" makes sense. Reverse it and before one processes the full title, one is left with the impression that it's a musical about the summer of love and / or perhaps a psychedelic trip. Why not title the show simply, Soul Train: The Musical.
First impressions. Walking into the theater, the exposed set was quite impressive. Designing the set as a period TV works well and the funky curves that extend into the house are fun.
In San Francisco, the stage deck is way too high. I had second row seats, which when I purchased them, I thought would be excellent, but unfortunately when the cast was upstage, they were often cut off at the knees. At the very least, sell the first 3 rows as partial view. Or preferably, when you move to Broadway, just lower the deck.
At 15m before curtain, the transformation to video was really cool. The projections throughout work well. I would have liked to have seen a few more practical set pieces, or at the very least some of the furniture props automated, arriving onstage without the cast having to place them. This would be particularly useful for Don Cornelius' office desk.
The main upstage center "S" screen needs to float better. From my perspective, I could see a cable supporting it. Is that absolutely necessary? Given its size, I understand the need for supports, but it seemed that supports could be placed in such a way that they are hidden.
Also, why the elevator? It seemed a rather large expense for something only used once to introduce the main character?
Overall, I liked the set. It was functional, yet provided the much needed space for the dancing.
The pre-show roaming lights, which every few seconds blinded me was just annoying. During the show, several times, when the lights were focused into the house they were just blinding with little positive effect. I was kind of pissed that they made it near impossible to see the onstage action as my eyes kept having to adjust. Fix this.
The lighting is one of the weakest elements missing some great opportunities to draw focus onto the storytelling. As the book is comprised of both dramatic scenes and a lot of 'story theater', having the lights help direct our attention would be extremely helpful. During the many montages, which were well written and engaging, I often found myself trying to find the ensemble member(s) who was speaking. Lighting could help solve this issue.
I understand that last night's performance had several missed cues, or perhaps new blocking that put key moments in the dark. I have no doubt that this will be fixed before opening.
Sound. By far the weakest element. Sound is so tricky and with every cast member needing to be miked intermittently this is going to be one very complex sound design. Last night, there were several sound issues, some just unfortunate technical ones. Those will get solved. What is more concerning is some serious clarity issues for someone sitting center orchestra close to the stage. It's loud (good thing) and the lead voices are all beautifully projected, but a lot of work is still needed on bringing the ensemble's voice to the audience in a clearer more crisp auditory experience.
Costumes were fun throughout. Perhaps, there is the possibility for Don Cornelius to change his suit, maybe even just his jacket to offer some visual interest.
Okay, the dancing. OMG!!!!!!!!! This is a love letter to both Camille A. Brown (choreographer) and the whole company. The dancing is simply spectacular. I have only one comment and this is for the director, Ms. Forbes. Lets us applaud.
The epic dance number halfway through act one would have had the audience stopping the show, up on our feet shouting "bravo". You had the opportunity to start an earthquake (something us San Franciscans know something about), but didn't provide the pause necessary for this to happen.
I am not black and don't come from a culture of 'shouting'. Last night, there were many people who do understand and feel comfortable with this sort of engagement. I was extremely grateful for those audience members and wish that my training to not shout back while in the theater wasn't so ingrained. None-the-less, I wanted to show my appreciation. I wanted to jump out of my seat stomping for joy. Let me. I sure felt it.
Direction. Mostly excellent. There are some major issues though. First, Ms. Forbes, I approached you at intermission and again at the end of the show. You were gracious and amazing in your willingness to hear me out. Power to you. You took my comments with an open heart and I commend you for being willing to listen. I also commend the work you've done creating this amazing work.
Here are my issues… From the second row, those moments where the cast are high up on platforms behind the TV panels can't be seen. I am not sure how far back you'd have to be to be able to see them. Those cast members who deliver lines from those locations need to step forward even if just an inch or two. I suggest providing either unseen safety straps, or extending those platforms an inch or two. Having them stick out slightly beyond the proscenium won't destroy the effect, but would make those moments so much more accessible.
The actor playing Tony Cornelius either has to cheat out or be blocked further upstage during the dramatic scene between him and his father. His looking upstage deprived us of his reactions during a very crucial scene.
Finally, and this might be for both the director and writer, the montages are wonderful, but there were several moments that weren't well timed. I'm not sure if the writer needs to add a few more words, or the actors need to be directed to pace their lines better, but the flow in and out of song, dance and words at times needs to be smoother. Those moments when there weren't any words and the ensemble seemed just waiting for the music to catch up, were jarring.
There are places that can be cut, but I never felt it was overly long, so I have no feedback there.
The company. Wow! Everyone was wonderful. Your leads have great voices and their stories seemed motivated. I was engaged. Your dancers. Magic. I was blown away by the dancers. Their commitment to the show is beyond question. It felt both joyous and like their very lives depended on their ability to communicate through movement. Simply spectacular.
So there you have it. A more detailed accounting of my impression.
Oh… The music was great. I'm an older man and I grew up on Soul Train. Wonderful choices.
For anyone who's read this far, go see The Hippest Trip. Its good. Very good. And, the dancing is beyond beyond.
ARTc3 formerly ARTc. Actually been a poster since 2004. My name isn't Art. Drop the "3" and say the signature and you'll understand.
Updated On: 9/1/23 at 05:59 PM