Posted: 1/11/16 at 2:14pm
I was thinking about this over the break while I was watching "The Lion in Winter," a great Christmas movie (!) with Katharine Hepburn (winning her third Oscar, tying with Barbra Streisand), Peter O'Toole, Anthony Hopkins (film debut), and Timothy Dalton (film debut). The movie was a critical and financial success, but the play only ran 92 performances. It starred Rosemary Harris (who won the Tony that year for Best Actress), Robert Preston (!) as Henry II, James Rado (yes, the original Claude and co-author of "Hair") as Richard Lionheart (Hopkins' role), and Christopher Walken as King Phillip (Dalton's role).
It got me thinking about other Broadway shows that didn't do so well in their original runs, but became critical and financial hits as films. I know there are plenty of projects that are the reverse (hit on stage, flop on film), but I could only come up with a few ...
- Chicago (which closed far too soon in its original run and was essentially eclipsed by A Chorus Line)
- Driving Miss Daisy (while I wouldn't call it a flop, it was a small Off-Broadway stage show that won the Pulitzer Prize but didn't really have legs until the movie came out)
- West Side Story (closed after a short but respectable run and without much awards recognition, going on to win 10 Oscars and become a huge financial hit)
- The Sound of Music (not even close to R&H's biggest hit, tying with Fiorello! that year for the Tony, but running for a relatively short time, then becoming one of the highest grossing films ever)
- The Trip to Bountiful (ran just 39 performances originally)
What others come to mind?
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 1/11/16 at 02:14 PM