I think the problem here is people confusing "critically acclaimed" or "award winning" actor with "A-list" actors. While there can be overlap, these aren't the same things. The majority of people on the street would probably have no idea at all who Michael Shannon is. He's not a box office draw outside of people who appreciate his award winning acting in largely unwatched critically praised independent movies, in mostly co-starring and supporting roles.
More people know who Bryan Cranston is, as the star of a highly watched AND critically acclaimed tv show for over 5 years. I'm pretty sure that's basically it.
If you got The Rock to star in a broadway play, he would be considered an A-list name. Richard Jenkins, probably not. It basically all comes down to name recognition, status, celebrity. Richard Jenkins is a fine actor, but most people probably couldn't even tell you his name if he was standing in front of them, ditto Michael Shannon. In this scenario/discussion, when you're specifically talking about box office draw and financials, an actor's pedigree has far less to do with being an "A-list" name than actual celebrity and name recognition.
Updated On: 7/12/19 at 04:06 PM