Posted: 8/18/25 at 3:20am
At the time there was certainly A LOT of hype of ‘greatest of all time’ for Ripley and it’s because of the intensity of her emotions, the strange uncanny feeling that Ripley’s performance was coming from a deep place of genuine trauma, and the unusual and thrilling quality of her unusual rock voice that is tested in all sorts of ways throughout the score.
I fully accept that without the voice everything seemed to collapse. I did see her on tour and everyone’s complaints are justified - it was painful watching her struggle with ‘so anyway’. But I will admit I still find myself occasionally ‘listening’ to the tour vocals intentionally because it’s like the most broken and sad version of her Diana - as if she has been trapped for years and has almost given up hope. I watched Ripley give every breath and ounce she could deliver the notes in ‘light’ and it was moving (and you'll find some way to survive....) - I don't think I've seen this moment so moving another time because of how desperate and real it looked like Ripley was trying to hold on, although she then missed the two following performances.
For what it’s worth, I think Ripley’s vocals improved a bit for the Barcelona version than the tour (but they also changed the ending of so anyway so she doesn’t have to hit those notes).
I have a feeling that people really don’t like vocal damage in actors. It was deadly for Bernadette (especially Follies), it was deadly for Ripley, it is deadly for Billy right now in Cabaret.
People seem forgiving for people who never really had a voice. But for people who did have a voice, when it goes, people don’t like it. Personally, I think it can add a certain broken quality to the performance and character but I always accept everything is always better when the voice is healthy.
Updated On: 8/18/25 at 03:20 AM
