Posted: 10/16/17 at 3:31pm
I feel like, more and more recently,* I've been seeing shows where the announced runtime is notably shorter than the actual runtime. I can understand a 5 minutes difference, maybe even 10 - they do say "approximate" after all. But recently I've seen shows that run 15, 20, 25, and sometimes even a full half hour longer than the runtime that is both listed on the website, and told to us by the the house staff. Sure, if it's in early previews, I get it. But these are shows that have been running for weeks or months. And many of them don't even have intermissions that could run long and contribute to the problem. What gives? Is it so hard to update these things? Is it so hard to say "2 hours" rather than "90 minutes" when the latter is simply incorrect? Is it a marketing ploy to avoid alienating people who can't sit through long shows?
(Sorry for the rant - I realize this is a total "first world problem," but so are all the things we complain about on here, and this one actually has had negative consequences for me).
*It's likely that this isn't a new problem, and that I've just become more aware of it since I my schedule got busier, and I had to be more aware of runtimes, to catch trains and the like.
Updated On: 10/16/17 at 03:31 PM