"HUNCHBACK is one of Disney's weakest animated films."
Tarzan, The Black Cauldron, The Great Mouse Detective, The Rescuers, The Aristocats, Fox and the Hound, Oliver & Company, Robin Hood, Chicken Little, Meet the Robinsons, Bolt, Home on the Range, Brother Bear, Treasure Planet, Atlantis, The Emperor's New Groove...
All movies that I love, but THESE are the weakest of the Disney animated films. HUNCHBACK is faaar from it. In fact, I see it as one of the best.
It's one of the most beautiful scores of all the Disney films, the story is very dark as mentioned and it's fabulously written to make it fit into the Disney genre. Let's not forget, in the actual story, Quasimodo is even more deformed, monster like, deaf, NOT a sweetheart and Esmerelda (even after he saves her life, the first time) is still repulsed and terrified of him. I LOVE the character they gave Quasi and the emotion and depth. Disney may change things to make them cutesy and lighter, but in the process, sometimes it actually works for the better. And we always seem to focus on the negative in this, and never the positive. Disney doesn't ruin EVERYTHING by putting the Disney spin on it. There's a reason these films were such huge successes, it was the Disney spin on the stories that made them more appealing to a wider audience, and sometimes even made the story itself better. I don't know about you, but I prefer the Disney versions of The Little Mermaid, Beauty & the Beast, Aladdin and Pocahontas over any other. And when you hear these titles, most people automatically think of the Disney films. Not Hans Christian Anderson or Arabic folk tales. There's a reason for that.
While I agree, they would most likely cut the things that made the European production so great out, (Esmerelda dying, Quasimodo killing Frollo) even with the movie stuff added back in, that wouldn't mean the show would be awful. It's still dark and dramatic in tone. Unless they make it cutesy and just cut out half the story, there's no way it can't be a dramatic, epic, dark story. There is no way they wouldn't squeeze the last drop out of "Hell Fire" on stage. Why would they take the risk in a family FILM and not on Broadway? More people have seen the movie than anyone would ever see on Broadway.
The MGM show was fabulous and you can watch the entire thing, Pro-Shot here:
http://vimeo.com/3878526 I have a soft spot in my heart for HUNCHBACK (as you can probably tell, lol) As a kid, seeing the movie, I walked away thinking it was good, but still prefering Lion King, Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin. As I got older, especially as of late, I have begun to appreciate the story and beautiful music and the humanness of it all. This is one of the only movies in the Disney Renaissance era, where I could actually BELIEVE it happened. The rest are all fairy tales and talking animals. It's just the most real, and that's why I think it would lend itself so well to stage. Better than any Disney film. And also...I must hear "Out There" sung on the Broadway stage before I die. lol
Thank you for endulging me. :)