One less than stellar review of Esparza makes Brantley biased? His review of Esparza's Company was a career-defining rave, and he generally gives Esparza very positive reviews otherwise.
And also, it would be helpful to look at the offending portion of Brantley's Leap of Faith review:
"Mr. Esparza would seem to be a natural for such a part. His onstage energy quotient is usually off the charts. He was terrific as the forked-lightning-tongued studio executive in the 2008 revival of David Mamet’s “Speed-the-Plow” and, in a more introspective mode, as the commitment-fearing urbanite in John Doyle’s 2006 production of “Company.” Artfully mix traits from each and, in theory, you’d come up with Jonas Nightingale, a self-questioning seller of hope.
Yet here Mr. Esparza seems to keep a chilly distance from his character, and you realize the degree to which self-consciousness has always been a part of his performances."
I don't think a critic trying to analyze why an actor they usually think is quite strong is not as successful in a role is biased.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Updated On: 7/11/16 at 12:11 PM