Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!

rOcKS @ 'Doubt' & 'Sweeney Todd' (UPDATED)

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#1

rOcKS @ 'Doubt' & 'Sweeney Todd' (UPDATED)

So, yesterday, I ventured into the city to see Doubt, and absolutley spur of the moment, I stopped by Sweeney Todd to see if they had any availablity for the evening performance, and they did (3rd row Mezz.--great seats)...so I saw two shows in one day, but it was not the day to do that. It was POURING yesterday in the city, and when I left Sweeney, the winds were unbelievable. It was such a disgusting day. Anyway, at least I got two good shows in. Both definitley worth trudging through the awful weather. I will post my Doubt review first as it was the first show I saw. My Sweeney review will be up later tonight or this afternoon.

To begin, you all must see Doubt as it is a splendid production jam packed with four outstanding, incredible, and all must-see performances. The show, for those of you who don't know, is about a priest who is accused of molesting a young, black boy at the church's school. Only one person accuses him and is relentless in her fight to bring him down, even if she may have no cold hard evidence. She is only armed with her doubts. And to top that, no one believes her. Throughout the show, the audience is torn back and forth from story to story, and *SPOILER* by the end, you are never really told if he did it or not, although my opinion is that he didn't. I know Sister Aloyisious did pretend to make that call, and I dont think thats why he left. I think he left the church simply because he wanted his name cleared and he wanted it all to be done with. But, when it is revealed in the final scene that Sister Aloyisious lied about the phone call, the shock has the impact of a truck hitting you. You are so blown away and so shocked and so taken aback. It was incredible to watch the faces of the audience members during this scene and when it is revealed that Sister Aloyisious has doubts about what she did. Just amazing *END SPOILER*

The show was written by Oscar and Tony winner John Patrick Shanley with biting ease and simplicity. That, in my opinion, is the charm of his writing, that it is so amazingly simple but so incredibly powerful. Less really is more here. His writing feels almost organic and it is so splendidly fluent. He really knows how to hit the audience under the belt when theyre not ready, and takes full advantage of that. The second to last scene with Sister Aloyisious and Father Flynn arguing was the most powerful yet simple scene I've ever witnessed from a drama. You wanted to get up and scream at one or the other, you wanted to hug and cry with them and tell them you understood even though you couldn't, you wanted to start applauding the biting remarks passed back and forth. The show evokes such a strong passion and feeling from you that is almost blinding. It is so shocking, so real, so undeniably raw, that you feel like you have begun to know and really get a good grasp around these characters and you can understand their pain. It's an incredibly written script. It's evoctive, engrossing, and gripping. GRADE: A-

The lighting was unimpressive, IMO. Simple, but maybe a little too simple. Nothing special here.

The sets. The sets for this show were a great amount of simplicity and realness. Excellent. I loved how the sets all slid in and out and worked with each scene so amazingly well.

The costumes. A very subtle and simplistic style was taken into effect here. The costumes did a great job of conveying the person wearing them.

The show is directed by Doug Hughes who really knows what he's doing scene by scene and has an uncanny ability to smoothy transfer the show from scene to scene. GRADE: B+

The cast:
-Brían F. O'Byrne as Father Flynn: Such an emotionally raw performance. He does an incredible job of winning the audience back and then losing them with the delivery of some of his lines. He is equal parts frightening, entertaining, involving, and lovable. His performance must be seen to be believed. I did not see him in Frozen, for which he won a 2004 Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Play, so I can't compare his two performances, but he is absolutley amazing in this role and if he was half as good in Frozen, I can say right now his Tony was won fair and square. I did not see the other leading actor in a play performances this year (I was extremley short on seeing straight plays this season), but his performance was Tony worthy. He gives Father Flynn such a realness and compassion while also balancing the hate that he holds in.

-Cherry Jones as Sister Aloyisious: The best performance in a straight play that I may have ever seen. It is so hard for me to even begin to describe how superb her performance was. She took a totally different approach character-wise than O'Byrne which may have been a good thing. Instead of creating all these layers and underlying stories that her character had, it seemed as though she just let the lines and the story do that. And it worked amazingly. You could see that she was a strcit, hard ass nun, but when you looked deeper, you could see that there was something, something indescribable, that made you kind of sympathize with her. She is extraordinary.

-Heather Goldenhersh as Sister James: She is obviously learning from Jones, and taking in her every move which is great. She seems to be really naive and vulnerable, but in a way strong. Not strong in the way Sister Aloyisious is, but a different kind of strong. It just can't be described. At first, she was somewhat cloying, but by the end of the show she as an actress had evolved her character so much that her performance became outstanding and simply phenomenal.

-Adriane Lenox as Mrs. Muller: I've never witnessed a more gripping and intense 10-minute performance in my life. She is only on the stage for maybe 10-15 minutes, but she is so great. Definitley Tony-worthy. She took the role step-by-step and let the audience peice together her pain instead of expressing it flat out. The pain that the audience does feel for her is awesome. It is a mix of sorrow and hatred. Of understanding and confusion. This is a great, great performance.

All in all, the show is a must see. The audience ate it up and if you don't go for anything else, go to see this cast. It is the best ensemble I've seen on stage in a while.

There was, however, to end my review, but not to discourage you, something missing still for me. I would give the show 3 and a half out of four stars, probably, becuase something seemed to be missing, I think it was the writing which lagged at the beginning and was a little slow, but took off at full speed toward the end. Nonetheless, this play is incredible and you all need to go see it now if you haven't already.


Updated On: 10/9/05 at 12:03 PM

#2

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

Excellent play. Saw it this past May.
Just give the world Love. - S. Wonder
#3

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

Her doubts aren't about what she did, her certainty that he is guilty never changes.
Nothing precious, plain to see, don't make a fuss over me. Not loud, not soft, but somewhere inbetween. Say sorry, just let it be the word you mean.
#4

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

True..sorry about that.
#5

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

No need to apologise. It's how a lot of people take the last line of the show, myself included, at least initially.
Nothing precious, plain to see, don't make a fuss over me. Not loud, not soft, but somewhere inbetween. Say sorry, just let it be the word you mean.
#6

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

After seeing a show about a priest accused of molesting children, I headed on over to the Eugene O'Neill theater to hear a song about eating a priest.

Sweeney Todd, for those of you who don't know, is a musical about a barber falsely accused of murder who comes back to London to seek revenge. He then meets Mrs. Lovett, who owns a pie shop and is, like most of London at that time, extremely poor and her business is sinking. Todd poses as a barber who cuts hair above Lovett's shop, and soon enough, he begins killing his customers, first there are those he is killing for a reason, but eventually, he goes absolutley crazy and begins killing most of his customers. I know this summary probably isn't 100% accurate, I'm just trying to sum up a very complicated and complex plot into a paragraph.

The show was first presented at the Uris (now Gershwin) theater in the late '70s and won 8 Tony Awards including Best Musical. It is now considered one of the best musicals ever written, by most, and it's currently playing at the Eugene O'Neill theater in New York. The show has music by the legendary Stephen Sondheim and a book by Hugh Wheeler.

Here are my thoughts on the book and music:
The Music: Masterful on every level. While you don't exactly leave the theater humming the songs, which obviously wasn't Sondheim's goal here, you do leave haunted by the music. The melodies and harmonies and quirky and eerie-ness of it makes it unique and totally original, even 25 years later. The score to this show will not appeal to all audience members. It never did, and it never will. It is something that people with a taste atone to the oddness of the music can truly and fully enjoy. The songs enhance and at times, explain the story line, so you have to listen very closely. I love this score and think it's Sondheim's masterpiece. GRADE: A

The Book: While not having many spoken lines, the ones that are are powerful and speak to the audience on so many levels. This book is creepy, entetaining, enlightening, and powerful. GRADE: A

Now, as you can see, I think that the book and music are amazingly powerful and splendid, but in my opinion, this particular production didn't do the story justice. That doesn't mean, however, that this production is bad. It's far from it. It just doesn't really take advantage of and do justice to the story that is being told.

The set: Simple, yet at times a bit confusing. You may forget or not know where you are at times, but you eventually catch on. I loved the shelves stacked to the ceiling with all sorts of trinkets. An enjoyable set, but one that will most likely leave a few confused with where the setting is for each scene.

The lighting: I loved the lighting for this show. Especially the moments where there was a spotlight on the object on the shelf that represented the scene occuring or the character that is on stage. The only little problem I had with it was that it should emphasize the blood-bucket moments and try to put more attention there when the blood is being poured into the buckets. I saw a few people around me tapping one another and pointing to the blood being poured and saying "look" which shouldn't have been needed, or people who noticed the blood being poured at the very end.

The costumes: Simple, but they didn't really express the character through the costumes as much as they could/should have. I know the characters are expressed through the songs/scenes/performances, but a costume that shows who you are doesn't hurt.

The orchestrations: Okay, here is where I agree 1000000000% with Margo's review. In his review, he stated that it really was impressive to have the cast accompany themselves on instruments, but was it neccesarry? What was the purpose? Another topic about the orchestra that he addressed which I totally agree with are the revivals of Cabaret and Chicago, in which it made sense to have the orchestra on stage. What's the purpose of having that here? Why is the orchestra on stage? It was just distracting me and taking away from the action on the stage. I am not bashing the orchestrations, however, which are absolutely gorgeous and terrifying. It just didn't make sense to me... I must say and give compliments to whoever assigned each cast member their instrument. Everyone's instrument make total sense to their character and worked well to evolve their roles.

The cast:
-Michael Cerveris as Sweeney Todd: A splendid performance, triumphant in every sense of the word. His entrance is haunting and exhilarating. *ENTRANCE SPOILER* For those of you who want to know how he makes his entrance, he climbs out of the coffin on center stage.*END ENTRANCE SPOILER* He is a phenomenal actor and a great singer, and really brings a much more (believe it or not) violent side of Sweeney out. He makes the character all the more intense and interesting and horrifying. As frightened as you may be of his performance, you simply cannot take your eyes off of him. He is wonderful.

-Patti LuPone as Mrs. Lovett: Dear lord. After a way to long absence from the stage, LuPone is back and in fine form. She will be duking it out, I predict, with LaChanze for Best Actress in a Musical at the upcoming Tonys. She was awesome. She brought such a new and more complex side to Lovett that made you fall in love with her but hate her at the same time. Undeniably one of the best living actors to perform on the Broadway stage, she justifies that title here. She has an uncanny ability to become the role she is playing. She is funny, scary, brilliant, and a gas to watch playing the tuba.

-Mark Jacoby as Judge Turpin: A great, stunning performance. He is so emotional on the stage and expresses his character's feelings and emotions so well that you get goosebumps all over your arms and legs.

-Donna Lynne Champlin as Pirelli: She was good. While not quite matching up to her fellow actor's performances, she was simply good. Entertaining and fun to watch, but I just don't think she has a good grasp on her role quite yet.

-Manoel Felciano as Tobias: A great, great performance. Heartwrenching, bone-chilling, and extremley off-kilter, he is stunning. He will definitley be hard to beat this year at the Tonys. He is wonderful.

-Alexander Gemignani as The Beadle: He made this role such a standout one that everytime he's on the stage you pay all the more attention. He is really great.

-John Arbo as Jonas Fogg: He does what he can with the small role he has. That's really all that can be said for him, and its not that he is bad, its just that he has such a small role.

-Diana DiMarzo as The Beggar Woman: A totally unique twist on this role was taken by DiMarzo. She is so unnerving, yet in a way engrossing as she pulls you into her story and her role via her creepiness.

-Benjamin Magnuson as Anthony: He is great. A clear, crisp voice with great acting skills. He is funny, gripping, and intense.

-Lauren Molina: She is simply good. Nothing amazing, nothing awful. She has a great voice, but her acting skills leave a lot to be questioned.

The direction of the show (John Doyle) is unique, but is holding the show back from really soaring. The show is so slow at the beginning, after the opening sequence, not because of the performances, not because of the music or book, not because of anything but the direction. I don't really know how to describe it but he never really lets to show soar, and there are times when it almost begins to but is flutters back to the ground slowly but surely. The show's best directorial moments are the finales for the second and first act. The opening sequence is haunting, totally different, and hair-raising. This is should have been his goal for all the other scenes as well. GRADE: C

The show is still very good. I'd give it a B or B+ maybe. There is room for a lot of improvement still. Mostly, directorial-wise. It is worth seeing though. The only thing I ask is to make sure who you go with as it's certainly not a production for everyone.
#7

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

Great review. i saw doubt in august (one of the best plays and performances i have ever seen) and im dying to see sweeny.
#8

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

I'm going to have to disagree about the need for the actors to play the instruments in SWEENEY. I think it was neccesary.

I may not be right, but the way the show opens, it seems like the set is meant to be reminiscent of a mental hospital. Hence all the white jackets hung up along the back wall.

When Toby begins to tell his story, it's as if the other patients in the ward have joined in to represent the characters he is telling the audience about. The actors as the musicians helps that vision in a way that it shows the other actors as playing along, in a sense. The orchestrations are simpler but I liked it that way. I reminded me of a traveling troupe of actors. From the moment the curtain rises I viewed all of the actors as patients in a mental ward. Once Toby begins to play his instrument it's as if the other patients are enthralled and begin to help him tell his story so they do so in their actions and their instrument playing. I don't know if I'm expressing my interpretation clearly, but I hope it's understandable. I wasn't distracted at all by the instrument playing. In fact, I found it neccesarry.

Costume wise, everything was kept simple...black and white. Sterile. Leaving it up to the actors to rely on nothing but their talent to portray their character. This is another thing that reminded me of patients in a mental hospital. I think the costumes worked...they were simple, but to me they made a statement.

I also thought the buckets of blood worked. I didn't find them distracting...I thought it was a great representation of the death of the characters. Remember, I viewed the whole show as a group of people telling a story. So, no one was actually going to be physically cut. The buckets were there to represent the murder and death...and I think it fit in perfectly. As did the bloody jackets.

The whole cast operated as a well oiled machine...dependant on one another to get the story across. And they did...remarkably.'

I give it an A.

"I love talking about nothing. It is the only thing I know anything about." - Oscar Wilde

Updated On: 10/9/05 at 03:29 PM

#9

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

Very Marat/Sade concept, no?
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.
#10

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

what's cherry jones's last line? (PM me if everyone is going to give birth to a cow over hearing a "spoilerrr")
#11

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

S
P
O
I
L
E
R











"I have doubts. I have such doubts."

Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.

Updated On: 10/9/05 at 03:39 PM

#12

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

I did enjoy the blood and thought it was clever and neccesarry.

I also enjoyed the orchestra being the cast ver very much I jusy didnt see how it worked in context. You make good points though FOA.
#13

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

Agree, Foa. And without giving anything away, it goes full circle by the end with that concept, right before they start the final Ballad of Sweeney Todd (with the "three times" line).

etf: humiliating spelling error

Updated On: 10/9/05 at 04:29 PM

#14

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

"I also enjoyed the orchestra being the cast ..very much I jusy didnt see how it worked in context."

I think the way to look at it is that the orchestra isn't the cast. The instruments, the score and the music are an extension to the actors - just as their speaking, singing voices are and their ability to move. They're not separate, they're organically part of the whole.

I also disagree about the direction - the whole pacing of the start which leads to the climactic end of Johanna is such an improvement and brings the audience into the story a great deal quicker.

Updated On: 10/9/05 at 04:50 PM

#15

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

Good point...fiatlux where is your avatar from? It looks like Sweeney. Is it the London production? If so, how'd you like it?
#16

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

Yes, it is the London version or more accurately the tour before it came to London.

I thought that this was a remarkable production - I've been in actor/musician productions before and in Sweeney and I must admit, I hadn't thought of this as a natural candidate - but it has excited and troubled me, with its haunting imagery eversince I saw it at the Trafalgar.
#17

re: rOcKS @ 'Doubt'

Awesome review. I saw Sweeney on Saturday 10/8 at 2pm. It was incredible. I was wowed. I agree with rOcKS' concerns about the orchestrastions and performers playing instruments. It was really a nice touch, but I am not sure it was necessary. I hope it runs a long time. The performers deserved a long run.

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $70
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $101