#1
Posted: 9/17/09 at 10:36pm
Just a few quick thoughts.
A fall from grace for Letts. I mean, it was pretty damn near impossible that it would be as good as or better than A:OC which is very true but more than that its just really not an exciting or fresh show.
There's some great banter between Franco and McKean's character (don't have my Playbill in front of me), mostly in the first act. But that's about it. I didn't feel ANYTHING for any of the characters and the plot was pretty uninvolving and pointless. Letts knows how to write, that's for sure, I just don't get why he deemed this worthy of being his second Bway venture. The second act was interminable. And I thought McKean's monologues were pointless and they did not ring true for me one bit. The first act is far better than the second but certainly is nothing spectacular.
The performances are fine though. McKean is good enough, Kate Budekke is funny, and the kid who plays Franco (again, I'm on my Bberry...can't get my Playbill now) is fantastic. I hope he's remembered when the Tony nods are announced.
The direction does nothing to keep the pace up. There's a lot of long, pensive pauses (don't know if this was Letts' idea or the director's) but they just make the show drag. About one or maybe two of the six or seven pauses work.
The set's nice, appropriate and all. Sound design needs to work on their cues.
I didn't despise it, its just...so pointless to me. Maybe I didn't get it. But after last years' fantastic crop of plays, we're not off to the best of starts. This was the first new show of the 09-10 Bway season I saw. And...ehhhh.
** out of ****
I'd be happy to answer any questions.
A fall from grace for Letts. I mean, it was pretty damn near impossible that it would be as good as or better than A:OC which is very true but more than that its just really not an exciting or fresh show.
There's some great banter between Franco and McKean's character (don't have my Playbill in front of me), mostly in the first act. But that's about it. I didn't feel ANYTHING for any of the characters and the plot was pretty uninvolving and pointless. Letts knows how to write, that's for sure, I just don't get why he deemed this worthy of being his second Bway venture. The second act was interminable. And I thought McKean's monologues were pointless and they did not ring true for me one bit. The first act is far better than the second but certainly is nothing spectacular.
The performances are fine though. McKean is good enough, Kate Budekke is funny, and the kid who plays Franco (again, I'm on my Bberry...can't get my Playbill now) is fantastic. I hope he's remembered when the Tony nods are announced.
The direction does nothing to keep the pace up. There's a lot of long, pensive pauses (don't know if this was Letts' idea or the director's) but they just make the show drag. About one or maybe two of the six or seven pauses work.
The set's nice, appropriate and all. Sound design needs to work on their cues.
I didn't despise it, its just...so pointless to me. Maybe I didn't get it. But after last years' fantastic crop of plays, we're not off to the best of starts. This was the first new show of the 09-10 Bway season I saw. And...ehhhh.
** out of ****
I'd be happy to answer any questions.