I'm not exactly sure how Equity rules work, am I wrong to think that even if Krakowski was secured for this project they still have to post a casting notice? Eric, I guess technically she could do it, but does she really want to do eight shows a week (though I'm not sure how vocally taxing Miss Adelaide can be) AND shoot a sitcom every day of the week. With a career already established I believe she doesn't really have to though maybe she really wants to play the part on Broadway. Also, I guess we have to consider that sometimes she literally has two scenes on 30 ROCK except for the few episodes where she is part of a major storyline. Now I'm also crossing my fingers for a cast recording.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
There's not a realistic moment in Guys & Dolls. It's a valentine to a Times Square that never really existed. It's why all of the descriptions of this production as "dark," "less colorful" have always worried me.
The '92 production managed to skillfully honor the look and sound of the original production, while seemingly minting something completely fresh. The colors were loud, the performance style was broad, and it's exactly what is required for '50s musical comedy.
The show is such a sturdy piece of writing that it can survive anything. But a "realistic" Guys & Dolls doesn't sound like a hell of a lot of fun.
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.
While I've only heard good things about the London production, I can't help but think, "When you see a show light a theatre aglow, you can bet that it's probably Guys and Dolls! Broadway's biggest arrival is another worn-out revival 'cause there's no risk producing a Guys and Dolls!"
Yeah, Krakowski had a strip tease in "Take Back Your Mink". Second row was an interesting place to be. But then again, really, when is Jane not naked?
I don't think they can get McGregor. He has a lot of films coming his way and Othello. Plus they can get someone better. BUT REMEMBER I SITLL LOVE HIM. ok good.
They should try to get Douglas Hodge again though. He was superb!
I mean, Denzel Washington? Gun to my head..of course.
G and D is one of my very favorite shows- 12 years is long enough between revivals for this classic. It's time for another generation to share the joy. But Les Mis? - that was too soon.
Well I'm excited for this because I still have yet to see Act II, and I won't watch the movie just so I can see the end. And if Krakowski is in this, count me in.
This could be a return for Harry Connick Jr. as Sky. How great would it be if he was Sky and Kelli O'Hara was cast as Sarah? I can feel the chemistry right now. Updated On: 6/6/07 at 11:12 PM
The Harry Connick Jr. idea is great, but I'd much rather see Erin Davie, Laura Benanti, Anika Noni Rose or Sara Gettelfinger tackling this role before Kelli O'Hara. I wonder who could play Nathan though?
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
Yeah I'm scared about casting for Nathan because he is a mixture of so many things. He has to be a slick gambler, handsome/charming enough to believe Jane Krakowski would be with him, and overall an excellent comedian. The only one that really comes to mind is Norbert Leo Butz.
Ray- do you just not want O'Hara because you find her boring? Just wondering if you saw Harry and her in The Pajama Game because their chemistry was amazing (that’s the only reason she gets an advantage for me). Out of the ones you proposed I could see Laura Benanti working the best. Does Anika Noni Rose have a legit soprano? But, for me the essence of Sarah Brown has already been captured so well by the original, Isabel Bigley (sp?), that I'll have a hard time listening to "If I Were a Bell" by another performer.
Jewishboy, I do find Kelli O'Hara boring (though I think she was impeccable as Clara in THE LIGHT IN THE PIAZZA), but I didn't see THE PAJAMA GAME and I've heard very good things about her chemistry with Connick Jr. so perhaps you're right. I just don't see her having the kind of mixture of comedy, strength, and indulgence (during the Habana sequence) that I'd expect for someone in this role. I think Gettelfinger would be great and she has the soprano, I assume Krakowski and Benanti have some kind of professional relationship having worked together in NINE so I would love to see them both during "Marry the Man Today." I doubt Anika has a legit soprano but if they went for off-beat casting, I would love to see what she could do with the role (I'd see her having a great transformation from strong moral missionary to drunk-with-love woman). To be honest, as long as Krakowski is involved, Melanie Griffith could play Sarah Brown and I'd still be there to see the show. You're right about the casting of Nathan, and Norbert Leo Butz is actually a great idea, he has all the qualities you mentioned.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
You know I really think that there was something special between Kelli and Harry. Because normally I would agree with what you said about Kelli not having the ability to mix the comedy in with the seriousness of the role. I mean that is how I felt about Kelli's performance in The Pajama Game when Harry wasn't on stage with her. But, every seen in The Pajama Game that involved the two of them on the stage together, especially "There Once Was a Man", the house was literally burning down from the heat between them.
"People that excel in the arts understand that the journey is the reward...the result an added bonus. Every day I act or train is a blessing and a dream come true. If Broadway beckons so be it. I have a personal definition of success that is unshakable by a possibly unobtainable goal." -HamletWasBipolar
"I'm tellin' you, the only times I really feel the presence of God are when I'm having sex and during a great Broadway musical." - Nathan Lane - Jeffrey
Highly unrealistic wishing, I know, but I'd kill to see Hugh Jackman as Nathan. They've been linking him with a forthcoming movie remake for years, and I've always said he'd be an awesome Nathan in that. He'd be an awesome Nathan onstage too, I'm sure of it.
Except he's probably way too busy with about fifty-eight million other jobs, busy boy that he is. XD
How about Marc Kudisch or Denis O'Hare? I'm not sure O'Hare would play well against Krakowski's Miss Adelaide but just putting that out there. Marc Kudisch on the other hand would be commanding enough to make it believable that Krakowski's Adelaide has been waiting to marry him for all those years, he also has done comedy in the past, and would be perfect for a production of GUYS & DOLLS that is less cartoonish and is darker instead. I'd love to see him and Krakowski go at it during "Sue Me." Not sure if he has too much of that leading man presence that is more associated with Sky though.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
Jane was great, u guys'll love her! I think Harry wud be great casting for Sky Even with a BAD cast (which I still havent seen one!) this show's gona shine cuz of the brilliant choreography! It's AMAZING!
Anyway... this is CRAZY but I just wish that they can have: Chita/Donna/Carol B as Adelaide Ben Vereen as Nathan
All That Jazz
Check out & support my drawings @ www.facebook.com/felixdrawings