I just listened to the CD of the Little Women musical, which I'd asked for for Christmas. (I'd already fallen in love with the song "Small Umbrella In The Rain," having heard it on Music Choice.) Does anyone have any opinions on WHY in God's name this show didn't do better?
Now, granted, I've never seen a production. But the score--to my ears, at least--is lovelier and more emotionally affecting than some shows that are established hits!
Of course, such things are subjective anyway...one listener's "lovely and emotionally affecting" may be another's "monochromatic". There's someone on RATM who insists that The Secret Garden's score, which I consider one of the most beautiful in all musical theater, is "monochromatic."
But...to my ears, LW has the score that most musicals wish they could have. So, what's your opinion?
I saw the show shortly after it opened and I did enjoy a lot of the music, and I loved Sutton Foster and Maureen McGovern. What I didn't love was the book. It was extremely dull and it tried to condense pages and pages of a novel into a two and half hour show. And IMO, there were just as many dull or bad songs as there were good songs. When I listen to it on the cast recording, I do enjoy the score more, so I can understand why you think it's so wonderful. The score works better on disc than it does in the theatre.
A little swash, a bit of buckle - you'll love it more than bread.
I saw it on Broadway, and very much enjoyed it As LizzieCurry already said, it was enjoyable, but lacked a WOW factor The score was fine with some very very good songs But the book was baaaad, just horrible writing and such Overall, I'm also very sad that it closed so early But with mixed to negative reviews, and not that great of advertising, the show didn't do all that well Yeah.
Just like you I love the score, then I saw it live and realized how BORING it was, not completely like I want to cry because its so boring but it wasn't great. The score is pretty amazing though.
"Passion can drive you crazy but is there any other way to live"
I saw it on Broadway, and I agree that the score is wonderful. I love it. But the show was very slow and dull. It could have been better, but the book was executed poorly. It was unfortunate as all the performers were wonderful and the score is great.
"This table, he is over one hundred years old. If I could, I would take an old gramophone needle and run it along the surface of the wood. To hear the music of the voices. All that was said." - Doug Wright, I Am My Own Wife
Hard to be interesting when the story has so little in it. Four girls and a mom waiting for Dad to come home from the war. Other than Beth's death, it is a time passing type story. Nice in a book, long day in the theater.
I think that while some of the score--especially the period numbers--was quite beautiful, too much of it was sort of dull pop ballads. It was just not quite good enough.
Yes, we do need a third vampire musical.--Little Sally, Gypsy of the Year 2005.
I don't think the material was universal. The advertising for the show was targeted toward mothers and little girls.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
The music may have been fine, but some of those lyrics were horrendous. I never bought the CD, but one lyric that I still remember from seeing the show on Broadway was something along the lines of:
"And we'll leave Concord unconquered!"
Lord! Does it get much worse than that?
"Winning a Tony this year is like winning Best Attendance in third grade: no one will care but the winner and their mom."
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
I never found the score very good. Very clunky and amateurish melodies and let's not even talk about the lyrics. Furthermore, it's so modern musical theatre in parts.. songs like the terrible Astonishing are just not appropriate given the subject matter and time period.
the novel Little Women is one of the top two favorite novels of mine. I read it when I was in the 5th grade and I can't even count how many times I've read it since. So when I found out they were doing a musical with Maureen McGovern I was SOOO happy. But it BLEW. I liked some of the songs. The girl who played amy was so annoying and it was sadly boring. And I still love the book and actually just finished reading it again because I was in the mood, but the musical wasn't...right.
Plus, the men came across as total pussies. I'm sorry I know that's not the most educated way of putting it, and it's rude to say, but seriously. Little Women is about strong women but these men were like little boys and in the book they were portrayed much more honestly.
Thats what it is. The musical wasn't honest to the time period or the original novel.
"It's a great feeling of power to be naked in front of people. We're happy to watch actual incredible graphic violence and gore, but as soon as somebody's naked it seems like the public goes a bit bananas about the whole thing."
SallyBrown...EXACTLY! Little Women is one of my all-time favorite books (I've read it several times), and the musical did not do it justice. The characters in the musical were written in a rather stereotypical, cookie-cutter fashion. (ex. "Amy is vain and whiny", "Meg is motherly", "Mr. Laurence is gruff".) Giving a character one characteristic will not carry him or her through a show or make him or her even remotely realistic. The romance in the novel is sweeping and beautiful, while the musical seemed to purposefully make it cliche and almost laughable. I suppose Laurie bothered me the most...because I practically fell in love with the character in the novel...They COMPLETELY rewrote him for the musical. He was nebbish and overly-polite and very unlovable! I totally understood why Jo said "no" in this instance.
I have to chime in that the musical -- lukewarm as it is -- more or less stood on its own independent of the book if you'd never read it. At least that's how it was for me. I hadn't even touched the book until after I saw the musical. And I'm still on page 5 or something.
"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt
I saw it on tour and found it enjoyable. I think that the book was one of the show's major weak spots. I felt that the March sisters (with the exception of Jo) were poorly developed. For example, Beth's death did not have the emotional impact it should have because the character was not developed. I went into the show not reading the novel and knowing next to nothing about the story and as a result, I didn't really connect with Beth because I hardly knew anything about her. The time changes didn't really make sense to me because in some instances the audience was never told of the change in time. (I found that telling the first act in flashback was kind of confusing)
The score is ok. There are some very good songs (Five Forever, Days of Plenty) , but also several VERY forgettable ones (The Most Amazing Thing, Take A Chance On Me, More Than I Am ). I agree that some of the lyrics are pretty generic and full of cliches.
Despite all this, I did find the show to be pretty good, mostly due to the very talented cast I saw on tour. I can see why it had trouble lasting on Brodway in a season with Spamalot, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels & The Light In The Piazza.
"You drank a charm to kill John Proctor's wife! You drank a charm to kill Goody Proctor!" - Betty Parris to Abigail Williams in Arthur Miller's The Crucible
Laurie made me want to hit him in the show. Stop whininh Laurie. Gawd.
"It's a great feeling of power to be naked in front of people. We're happy to watch actual incredible graphic violence and gore, but as soon as somebody's naked it seems like the public goes a bit bananas about the whole thing."
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
I also saw it early in its Broadway run and I remember walking out of that theatre and...... Well, honestly that's about all I remember. It was absolutely tedious and I do recall that as I left I couldn't recall one single song. No melody, no words, no nothing. I was so excited about having Maureen and Sutton back on stage and I couldn't have been more disappointed.
www.thebreastcancersite.com
A click for life.
mamie4 5/14/03