.- Page 83

[Broadway Joe]

Posted: 10/11/16 at 10:18am

This is amazing lol

 

 

Updated On: 10/11/16 at 10:18 AM

[ErikJ972]

Posted: 10/11/16 at 10:23am

Petralicious said: "I always thought it stupid how Bernie fans say they refuse to vote for Hillary. Even though I still think it stupid, I can almost understand why. This is the second time now that a top DNC person has showed that the fix was really in against Bernie. Bernie was right, it really was not a fair contest.  This is not Hilarys fault but she needs to denounce her and call for her to be replaced.  This Brazille must be fired and join Debbie on the beach. 

WikiLeaks has just revealed that Brazile, in fact, actively conspired against Sanders, acting as a “mole who tipped off Clinton campaign about Sanders planned Twitter storm.”
 

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/3585434/well-obviously-donna-brazile-needs-to-resign-now-too/"

There aren't many Sanders supporters saying that anymore. 

And I'm suppossed to be mad that Donna Brazile forwarded some tweets?

[javero]

Posted: 10/11/16 at 11:56am

@HorseTears -- Thanks for turning me on to "50 Shades of Crazy" 

Updated On: 10/11/16 at 11:56 AM

[henrikegerman]

Posted: 10/11/16 at 12:20pm

I was a Bernie supporter in the primaries.  I am now a Clinton supporter.

I was genuinely disturbed by some of the revelations from the DNC - as I was by the consideration of some at that organizaiton to out Bernie as an atheist.  

But I'm finding it hard to be concerned about this report about Donna Brazile and the Twitter Storm.

It seems to me that if one Democratic campaign tells the DNC that there is or is about to be a twitter storm - and, it might be asked, why would they share that info if they wanted to keep it under wraps? - over something, there is nothing wrong with anyone at the DNC sharing that information with any other Democratic campaign.  The DNC owes a duty of fair-dealing to all the campaigns.  And, yes, indeed, there were problems with that in this cycle - and, thankfully, heads rolled over it.  

But this particular instance isn't a case of that.  This is a case of, if anything, the DNC being fair to all campaigns.   Moreover, the DNC has no obligation to keep secret information from one campaign shared with it by another one, least of all when that information concerns social networking which is already underway (my reading of the story from the link below) or about to be imminent.

http://observer.com/2016/10/breaking-dnc-chief-donna-brazile-leaked-sanders-info-to-clinton-campaign/

Updated On: 10/11/16 at 12:20 PM

[Kad]

Posted: 10/11/16 at 12:25pm

Calling Donna Brazile a "mole" is wild. It's not like she was undercover in the Sanders campaign.

[adamgreer]

Posted: 10/11/16 at 5:07pm

The implosion continues...now he seems eager to take everyone down with him. 

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-shackles-trump-takes-aim-paul-ryan?cid=sm_fb_maddow

[madbrian]

Posted: 10/12/16 at 8:28am

A poll in Utah has Clinton and Trump tied at 26%, with independent Evan McMullin at 22%.  

[PalJoey]

Posted: 10/12/16 at 6:38pm

 

Nate Silver's NowCast just went over 90%

 

[madbrian]

Posted: 10/12/16 at 7:27pm

And the Times just released stories from women accusing Trump of unwanted kissing and groping. 

[Jay Lerner-Z]

Posted: 10/12/16 at 7:45pm

The idiot Republicans who keep endorsing and un-endorsing remind me of Mary Macgregor in The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie who, trying to escape a fire, "ran hither and thither until she died".

Sad, really.

Updated On: 10/12/16 at 07:45 PM

[sabrelady]

Posted: 10/12/16 at 8:42pm

OMG_

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/11/the-trumpettes-the-glamorous-world-of-the-women-supporting-donal/

May babies I love you but your brain be broke. You cray.

[PalJoey]

Posted: 10/12/16 at 10:41pm

 

The rest of the campaign is going deeper into the gutter than American politics has ever experienced. Women are going to come forward saying that Trump stuck  his fingers in their vaginas and forced his tongue into their mouths, and starting Thursday evening the Trump campaign will have on Hannity every woman who has ever claimed that Bill Clinton raped her. The Trump campaign has vowed to turn Bill Clinton into Bill Cosby.

The worry here is that millennial women (and men) have become accustomed to erring on the side of believing a woman when she says she was abused. Young people will not necessarily see Bill Clinton's accusers as women who have been manipulated by the Trump campaign to voice their stories for Trump's political benefit. They will equate the experiences of the women accusing Trump with the experiences of the women accusing Bill Clinton.

Trump knows he's going down, and he wants to bring Hillary and the media and the office of the presidency and the United States down with him.

 

Updated On: 10/12/16 at 10:41 PM

[adamgreer]

Posted: 10/12/16 at 10:43pm

Do millennial women watch Hannity, though?

[ErikJ972]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 6:20am

The most vile election of my lifetime. I can't wait for it to be over. I predict voter turnout, especilly among millenials, will be at an all time low.

[South Florida]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 7:46am

Still almost four more weeks of this.  It will seem like a year.

[Petralicious]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 8:52am

I think most young people already know that Bill is dirty old man, and do not really care.  I do think the emails of Clinton and her staff mocking Catholics and People of Faith are a  big  dangerous wild card. It really hurt Obama when he talked about Those people with their guns and God. Probably how he lost the Evangelicals.

Updated On: 10/13/16 at 08:52 AM

[newintown]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 9:17am

"I do think the emails of Clinton and her staff mocking Catholics and People of Faith are a  big  dengerous [sic] wild card."

You do realize that there was only one email, it was from 2011, and the two people who wrote/responded were not on the Clinton staff then, and only one is now? And that single email was "released" by Wikileaks, and has not been authenticated by any reliable source? Did you know that?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/hacked-email-catholics-sparks-republican-outcry-42760356

Just the smallest bit of research goes a very long way towards the truth (even though it's much easier to just believe any old headline that tells you something you already believe).

For instance, even ABC News, in the piece linked above, moronically identifies the Center for American Progress as "Democratic," when it is, and always has been, independent and nonpartisan.

Fight the ignorance, everyone - it's your duty.

Updated On: 10/13/16 at 09:17 AM

[Petralicious]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 9:32am

It does not matter if it was just one email about something to people that this is important to.Just like one remark about "those people" or Romneys 1 remark about 47% of people pay no taxes.  Or even one remark about grabbing someone by the ****.  Or I am not a crook, One remark is all it takes.   Groups are already making this a big deal.

I hope she fires and denounces them. That would calm everyone down.

Oh and Washington Post also calls Center for American Progress a Liberal Thinktank too

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/10/12/wikileaks-emails-show-clinton-spokeswoman-joking-about-catholics-and-evangelicals/

Get out of bubble everybody  - it's your duty.

 

[newintown]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 9:36am

"I hope she fires and denounces them."

Maybe you missed these two bits of info the first time:
1) there is only one Clinton campaign staffer involved ("her," not "them", and
2) the single email "released" has not been verified as genuine.

"Oh and Washington Post also calls Center for American Progress a Liberal Thinktank too."

1) "Liberal" does not equal "Democrat."
2) https://www.americanprogress.org/about/mission/

Again, just a little investigation goes a long way toward finding the truth.

Fight the ignorance, everyone - it's your duty.

Updated On: 10/13/16 at 09:36 AM

[Petralicious]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 9:39am

1) "Liberal" does not equal "Democrat."
 2) https://www.americanprogress.org/about/mission/
From your link:

As progressives, we believe America should be a land of boundless opportunity, where people can climb the ladder of economic mobility. We believe we owe it to future generations to protect the planet and promote peace and shared global prosperity.
And we believe an effective government can earn the trust of the American people, champion the common good over narrow self-interest, and harness the strength of our diversity.

Yes, this does sound Democrat at all!
 
Ok HER, does that make you feel better? Fire Her. 

Updated On: 10/13/16 at 09:39 AM

[newintown]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 9:48am

This is like trying to teach a chicken to tap dance...

You sound as though you think that (very American) mission statement is some insidious Communist plot.

[Petralicious]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 9:52am

newintown said: You sound as though you think that (very American) mission statement is some insidious Communist plot.

I am implying nothing of the statement. In fact I like most of it.  I am implying that your statement about it is not honest. 

 
And if you think that one remark doesnt matter, than you are not being honest about that either. Just think about all the one remarks that have caused uproar or change.

Updated On: 10/13/16 at 09:52 AM

[newintown]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 10:01am

"I am implying that your statement about it is not honest."

I am universes more "honest" than you are - you're holding to demonstrably untrue statements merely because you like the sound of them. The Center is officially independent and nonpartisan (read their mission statement again). If some people find their work to be left of center, that's their perception, but it's not the Center's mission.

"And if you think that one remark doesnt [sic] matter, than you are not being honest about that either."

I'm guessing that you're referring to the email under question again - I really hate that I need to repeat this: it has not been verified. You merely choose to believe that it's genuine because it's consonant with your prejudices. And that is what we call "dishonest."

[Petralicious]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 10:09am

It is dishonest to say that the Clinton Campaign, and I am not blaming her personally but her campaign, has been on an anti-religious agenda. This is not just one email.  This is Washington Post saying this...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/10/12/wikileaks-emails-show-clinton-spokeswoman-joking-about-catholics-and-evangelicals/

It is not just ONE Email. There is the another one about "The Catholic Spring"

Another email that was released appears to suggest that Clinton’s campaign set up Catholic groups to organize on issues such as contraception. Sandy Newman, president of Voices for Progress, wrote in an 2011 email to Podesta that there needs to be “a Catholic Spring,” referring to the “Arab Spring,” a wave of demonstrations and protests in the Arab world.

 

as well as the using Jewishness against Bernie thing that happened earlier. 

arlier in the summer, internal Democratic National Committee emails were published publicly that appeared to show officials discussing using Sen. Bernie Sanders’s faith against him with voters, with one saying “my Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.” Those emails were also published by WikiLeaks.

None of these Emails from WikiLeaks has been discredited

Updated On: 10/13/16 at 10:09 AM

[CarlosAlberto]

Posted: 10/13/16 at 10:27am

I'm sure everyone on here knows that Petralicious is most definitely suestorm, right?

He/She/It is not fooling anyone.

It continues to blather on about something, something without making much sense, that and it has poor reading comprehension.