One person's profound masterpiece is another person's tired bag of cliches.
BLACK SWAN just came off like a Charles Busch play, brought to the screen by Darren Aronofsky without ever realizing that it is a comedy. His first film, the tedious PI, had the same vibe -- the right filmmaker, a Terry Gilliam for example, could have made it into an engaging lively film. But Aronofsky's suffocating solemnity doesn't allow for anything as base as humor -- he takes refuge in cheap scares, scary lesbian sex scenes, and transparently obvious reality/fantasy confusion. There is nothing to this film, nothing at all, but empty gimmickry.
2010 has been remarkably rich in this kind of drivel. Scorsese's SHUTTER ISLAND and Nolan's INCEPTION trotted out this same bullsh*t earlier this year -- phony gimmickry masquerading as serious storytelling. At least BLACK SWAN spares us SHUTTER ISLANS's Holocaust flashbacks, but its ridiculous solemnity and High Gothic plot mechanics sinks whatever else it might think it has on its mind. The hints about female self-mutilation and anorexia give an idea of what a serious film on the topic might have brought to the fore, instead of Aronofsky's slasher movie silliness.
My opinion of course. Folks for whom CHICAGO and MULHOLLAND DR. are pinnacles of cinematic achievement will doubtless disagree. That of course is the fun of a board like this, the chance to read differing takes on a movie, play, whatever.
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/