Sorry, but I'm not counting Florida and Michigan, at least not until the committee makes their decision at the end of the month. Both states were in violation of the rules and Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan. As far as I'm concerned, in order to fairly and accurately asses the popular vote in either state, the primary election in both states would have to be a redo; and that's not going to happen.
"Obama is ahead of Clinton by just over 618,000 votes out of 32.2 million cast in states and territories where both candidates competed and where the popular vote was counted in some way."
"That total excludes Florida and Michigan, which held early primaries in violation of party rules. Democratic candidates agreed in advance not to campaign in those states. In addition, Obama did not have his name on the ballot in Michigan while Clinton did."
"But even if results of the two renegade primaries are accepted, she still has a problem demonstrating she is the vote leader."
"That's because no results go into that equation from Iowa, Nevada or Maine. There is no way to count popular votes from those states because their caucuses did not tally them."
Updated On: 5/21/08 at 12:17 AM