#2
Posted: 3/8/06 at 9:16pm
weirdest book ever, but I sort of liked it
Updated On: 7/13/06 at 09:16 PM
#3
Posted: 3/8/06 at 9:22pm
Do you know if they are going to take out some of the parts with Neil and Augusten...alone...you know...
I am asuming that they would considered that it was very...detailed.
I am asuming that they would considered that it was very...detailed.
And.....SCENE!
#4
Posted: 3/8/06 at 9:24pm
I have no idea.
Updated On: 3/8/06 at 09:24 PM
#5
Posted: 7/11/06 at 1:09am
I think the cinematography is going to be very crafty in telling the audience about Bookman and Augusten's sexual relationship. They cannot possibly go into all of the details, being the world we live in today. I mean, look at "Angels in America". One of the most liberal pieces aired on HBO concerning gay sex. They showed Joe's face, in the dark, akin to the sounds of the action. I think similiar things are going to take place.
The way they're pitching the movie in the trailier? I don't know what direction they're taking this in. It's dark humor, but by no means, a comedy! It's not something you can take your children to or a chick flick. However, Augusten Burroughs himself gives his 110% blessings on the project so I trust his judgement.
The way they're pitching the movie in the trailier? I don't know what direction they're taking this in. It's dark humor, but by no means, a comedy! It's not something you can take your children to or a chick flick. However, Augusten Burroughs himself gives his 110% blessings on the project so I trust his judgement.
Bill Finn rocks. Woot.
#6
Posted: 7/11/06 at 1:36am
I absolutely love this book, among with all of his other books and am incredibly excited that they are making a movie out of it. I saw my first Running with Scissors commercial the other day in a movie theatre and almost peed myself from excitment and laughter.
Every part that they showed I could pick out from the book and I can't imagine Augusten letting them **** up his book. And hearing that he is backing it completely is awesome!
I have wondered whether or not they were going to add in the whole 'gay factor' considering it isn't anywhere near what made the household so odd but I did see some guy in the preview that wasn't mentioned but they said who played him.
Considering Augusten's cynical humor, I can't wait to see how they interpret it.
And not to make this way too incredibly long, even thinking back on the book, I always have to remind myself that this stuff really happened to someone, that it's REAL.
Every part that they showed I could pick out from the book and I can't imagine Augusten letting them **** up his book. And hearing that he is backing it completely is awesome!
I have wondered whether or not they were going to add in the whole 'gay factor' considering it isn't anywhere near what made the household so odd but I did see some guy in the preview that wasn't mentioned but they said who played him.
Considering Augusten's cynical humor, I can't wait to see how they interpret it.
And not to make this way too incredibly long, even thinking back on the book, I always have to remind myself that this stuff really happened to someone, that it's REAL.
"That's what writers do. We cut ourselves open and just bleed all over the page."
#7
Posted: 7/11/06 at 1:46am
one of my favorite books and cannot wait to see the movie!
RIP Natasha Richardson. ~You were a light on this earth ~
#8
Posted: 7/11/06 at 2:16am
Who is Fern in the book? I remember her being mentioned but I can't remember why...
"That's what writers do. We cut ourselves open and just bleed all over the page."
#9
Posted: 7/11/06 at 2:59am
I'll probably go out and buy the book this weekend. I was going to Friday, but I bought the Virgin Suicides instead. (It's been on the list since I first saw the movie.)
#11
Posted: 7/11/06 at 8:05am
Namo will, no doubt, weigh in when he reads this thread (or perhaps my post), but didn't Burroughs suffer a little negative press over having "fictionalized" a fair amount of this narrative?
#12
Posted: 7/11/06 at 8:55am
Beerchild, Fern is her lover. (Go Kristin !!!!!!!)
I am so excited.
I am so excited.
And.....SCENE!
#14
Posted: 7/11/06 at 4:56pm
Wow, I hadn't heard about any negative press towards the book because of 'fictionalized' events. Hopefully that isn't true but who knows!
Go Kristin being a lesbian!
And now that I've been reminded who Fern is...I understand why it was said that she'd only be kissing. *evil laugh*
Go Kristin being a lesbian!
"That's what writers do. We cut ourselves open and just bleed all over the page."
#16
Posted: 7/11/06 at 5:00pm
I can't wait!!!! I think everyone should play a lesbian at least once in their life. Boy or Girl. I have, and it was very fun.
Can't wait to see it!
Can't wait to see it!
And.....SCENE!
#17
Posted: 7/11/06 at 7:41pm
I'm pretty sure Burroughs was sued by the family depicted in the book. I seem to remember their claim being that he didn't change it enough - so much so that people knew who Burroughs was talking about by his description of the house and it's location - that they were angry at how identifiable they were from the clues in the book.
#18
Posted: 7/11/06 at 8:02pm
I thought he was the one depicted in the book?
#19
Posted: 7/11/06 at 8:27pm
Well considering the things that the people did, how could they become unrecognizable? I mean..those aren't things that a lot of people do. And he changed the names...oooh well. Whether people know it is them or not is the LEAST of their worries.
He is depicted in the book, but it's the story of him growing up with his mother's shrink's 'family.'
He is depicted in the book, but it's the story of him growing up with his mother's shrink's 'family.'
"That's what writers do. We cut ourselves open and just bleed all over the page."
#20
Posted: 7/11/06 at 9:08pm
Ah.
And the case, if it's real, should be thrown out. As writers, we can write about anyone, as long as their names are changed. If the people portrayed don't like how they're portrayed, and as long as it's not defamation/libel (which, from what I hear, may be) then I don't think the people can sue.
And the case, if it's real, should be thrown out. As writers, we can write about anyone, as long as their names are changed. If the people portrayed don't like how they're portrayed, and as long as it's not defamation/libel (which, from what I hear, may be) then I don't think the people can sue.
#21
Posted: 7/11/06 at 11:08pm
And what about the crap he completely made up? The stuff that you were reading and thinking, "You can't make this stuff up!"
Guess what? Yes you can.
And what happens when made up stuff is ascribed to real life people barely disguised?
Guess what? Yes you can.
And what happens when made up stuff is ascribed to real life people barely disguised?
Twitter @NamoInExile
Instagram none
#22
Posted: 7/12/06 at 8:30am
That's what I remembered. The family sued over more than the casual resemblane they shared to the family in the book, they sued over what I'm guessing was libel.
Time for a little Google research (and how I hate not being able to have a Lexus Nexus subscription).
Time for a little Google research (and how I hate not being able to have a Lexus Nexus subscription).
#23
Posted: 7/12/06 at 5:42pm
I actually got bored and did the Google search and found out two things.
1. There is no Bookman blowjob. That wasn't really what I was looking for but that came up in an interview.
2. He was brought to court by the family because they were 'defamed and grossly misinterpreted' but it didn't say what happened in court. In an interview he did say that he expects people to bring him to court over little things but that everything in the books are true and that he could prove them.
And to anyone interested...definitely go to his website, there is some really funny stuff on there.
1. There is no Bookman blowjob. That wasn't really what I was looking for but that came up in an interview.
2. He was brought to court by the family because they were 'defamed and grossly misinterpreted' but it didn't say what happened in court. In an interview he did say that he expects people to bring him to court over little things but that everything in the books are true and that he could prove them.
And to anyone interested...definitely go to his website, there is some really funny stuff on there.
"That's what writers do. We cut ourselves open and just bleed all over the page."
#24
Posted: 7/12/06 at 5:45pm
"...everything in the books are true and that he could prove them."
And did he do so?
And did he do so?
Twitter @NamoInExile
Instagram none
#25
Posted: 7/12/06 at 6:05pm
Oh, I have no idea. He didn't mention that he HAD been taken to court, just that it wouldn't surprise him. So the interview may have been before the actual thing happened.
"That's what writers do. We cut ourselves open and just bleed all over the page."
BroadwayWorld TV
Ticket Central