Updated: Kate Middleton gives birth to a son. — Page 4
Posted: 7/23/13 at 7:12am
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 7/23/13 at 12:28pm
http://www.thedailybeast.com/videos/2013/07/23/the-muppets-welcome-the-royal-baby.html
Posted: 7/23/13 at 12:36pm
Posted: 7/24/13 at 5:24pm
Posted: 7/24/13 at 5:38pm
Posted: 7/24/13 at 5:39pm
Posted: 7/24/13 at 5:58pm
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 7/24/13 at 8:52pm
Almost as if the royals are trying to keep up with them.
Posted: 7/25/13 at 1:43am
Posted: 7/25/13 at 9:05am
Updated On: 7/25/13 at 09:05 AM
Posted: 7/25/13 at 10:23am
Posted: 7/25/13 at 10:24am
Posted: 7/25/13 at 10:34am
Updated On: 7/25/13 at 10:34 AM
Posted: 7/25/13 at 10:38am
Posted: 11/27/23 at 2:57pm
Oh look, a thread from 12 years ago where I expressed disgust at the British Royal Family. Before I even knew that Highland Guy existed! What a bully I am.
Posted: 11/27/23 at 4:41pm
beautywickedlover said: "On July 22, 2013, a son was born."
And that son became "His Royal Highness Prince George of Cambridge". And upon the passing of his Great-Grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, that son became "His Royal Highness Prince George of Wales". By all accounts, a splendid boy. Following centuries-old honored tradition, that boy in due time is likely and destined to become Monarch.
As it should be.
Posted: 11/27/23 at 5:43pm
It's pretty unseemly for Americans to gush over institutionalized class systems and royal birthrights.
Posted: 11/27/23 at 6:06pm
kdogg36 said: "It's pretty unseemly for Americans to gush over institutionalized class systems and royal birthrights."
NAH
Posted: 11/29/23 at 1:36pm
Highland Guy said: "beautywickedlover said: "On July 22, 2013, a son was born."
And that son became "His Royal Highness Prince George of Cambridge". And upon the passing of his Great-Grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, that son became "His Royal Highness Prince George of Wales".By all accounts, a splendid boy. Following centuries-old honored tradition, that boy in due time is likely and destined to become Monarch.
As it should be."
Why? We don't have a monarch precisely because that's not "as it should be."
Posted: 11/29/23 at 3:59pm
hork said: "Highland Guy said: "beautywickedlover said: "On July 22, 2013, a son was born."
And that son became "His Royal Highness Prince George of Cambridge". And upon the passing of his Great-Grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, that son became "His Royal Highness Prince George of Wales".By all accounts, a splendid boy. Following centuries-old honored tradition, that boy in due time is likely and destined to become Monarch.
As it should be."
Why? We don't have a monarch precisely because that's not "as it should be.""
My comment had nothing at all to do with the United States. ![]()
Posted: 11/29/23 at 4:18pm
You said it.
In fact, it is the OPPOSITE of everything the United States stands for.
Updated On: 11/29/23 at 04:18 PM
BroadwayWorld TV