I believe bullying- actual, legitimate bullying- DOES go on here.
But in this situation? No.
Winston et al. posted less than flattering opinions of Pascal. That is not up for debate. It was not vicious, it was not chronic, it was not bullying.
Pascal responded in a thoroughly over-the-top manner- equaling and perhaps surpassing the perceived slight by hurling out generalizations and barbs of his own. It wasn't merely "defending himself." It lacked class and tact.
By repeatedly invoking "bullying," Pascal is watering down the word. He's applying his situation- which seems to me like nothing more than an ego bruised by some unflattering opinions- to a truly damaging phenomenon that ruins or destroys lives. And he isn't the only one to do this.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Updated On: 6/5/13 at 04:07 PM