Audience Having a Bad Time?

msmp said: "Itonlytakesajourney said: "A recent one for me was Mean Girls. It could’ve largely been my distaste for the show, but the jokes landed tepidly and the audience’s laughter was hit or miss. The cast did their absolute best with the material given, but I felt the audience wasn’t really into it.

Once On This Island was another experience where I honestly couldn’t tell if the audience was enjoying themselves or not. I know I certainly did, but the applause was again very tepid right up until the end. Made me cringe a bit when big numbers got halted/timid clapping, honestly."

The latter happened to me both at OOTI and at Oklahoma! so part of me is wondering if it's to do with Circle In the Square somehow, as if the audience surrounding the stage makes people think it's less appropriate to clap? Because the audiences for each show, and the shows themselves, when I went were vastly different (OOTI was much younger and more diverse, and despite the target audience, the crowd for OK was much much older) and had similar reactions."

I saw "The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee" at the CITS twice and the audiences were very enthusiastic each time. There were moments when the cast paused because audience responses became so raucous and so they ad-libbed.

One performance that was muted was 'Elaine Stritch at Liberty' at the Wilbur Theatre in Boston a few years back. There was muted laughter throughout but lots of aahs and oohs and during intermission I heard people saying how great the show was. My perspective was that the CD and DVD had been out for some time at that point and many members of the audience were familiar with the show. I don't think I Iaughed out loud once but I was thoroughly entertained and the standing ovation she received at the end was long and very enthusiastic.

I haven’t noticed the whole audience having a bad time, but I’ve seen instances of individuals obviously having a bad time. The man in front of me at Wicked dozed off and was audibly snoring. (I couldn’t blame him. I don’t understand the appeal of Wicked and find it tedious and plodding.) When I saw Oklahoma!, one of the on-the-floor audience members Ado Annie chose to engage during “I Cain’t Say No" glared at her, unamused. I liked how Ali Stroker handled this — she became as serious as he was, not glaring back, but transforming from jokey to serious as if she were accepting his response.

While this isn't Broadway, the worst audience response I have seen was a few months ago at a regional production of "Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime". I love this play, I have seen recordings of it and have read it before, so I'm very familiar with it. I go into this show and it's a house full of subscription-based theatre goers, all much older people. I have no idea why, but they barely reacted to anything. There were these awkward moments after a scene where I wanted to clap, but no one else was, so I didn't and it just felt wrong. Even at the end of Act I, there was about 10 seconds of blackness before people knew it was intermission (the lady next to me actually asked if that was it). The biggest reaction the audience gave was at the puppy at the end, but that was it.

I had assumed it was an age thing (as maybe older people just didn't understand that play?), but I might be wrong on that. It's a shame too because the production was great, only with slight problems with minor actors flubbing their British accents. Also I saw another production there of Legally Blonde afterwards and the audience enjoyed that, so it's hard to say why that particular audience didn't give much of a reaction.

DoTheDood said: "While this isn't Broadway, the worst audience response I have seen was a few months ago ata regional production of "Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime". I love this play, I have seen recordings of it and have read it before, so I'm very familiar with it. I go into this show and it's a house full of subscription-based theatre goers, all much older people. I have no idea why, but they barely reacted to anything. There were these awkward moments after a scene where I wanted to clap, but no one else was, so I didn't and it just felt wrong. Even at the end of Act I, there was about 10 seconds of blackness before people knew it was intermission (the lady next to me actually asked if that was it). The biggest reaction the audience gave was at the puppy at the end, but that was it.

I had assumed it was an age thing (as maybe older people just didn't understand that play?), but I might be wrong on that. It's a shame too because the production was great, only with slight problems with minor actors flubbing their British accents. Also I saw another production there of Legally Blonde afterwards and the audience enjoyed that, so it's hard to say why that particular audience didn't give much of a reaction."

Sometimes it's just the audience got that day. Im 99 percent sure I saw both of those same productions (family tickets to the Walnut are a family tradition of mine), and at the end of TCIotDitN was the biggest standing ovation I had seen there in years. And it was mostly the same kind of crowd age wise you described. Also it was one of few times I cried in a theater, the scene between him and his father towards the end of act one after the Dad hits him was... it was the most tense audience I've been with, it was great. Sometimes crowds just have good or bad energy.

Also, this is going to sound pretentious but some shows should not have applause till the bows, or should have have the audience being comfortable, or should end in silence. Like if people applaud at the end of Cabaret it's a failure, as the ending of Cabaret is "You've been ignoring what's been going on with these characters, you loved the emcee despite his obvious turn to fascism, you would have made a good Nazi". One reason I hate the Sam Mendes production and every production that follows its example is that they turn the face of fascism into a tragic queer figure (as a queer person...I have issues with this), but it does get a desired effect. Rather than the audience leaving uncomfortable, or challenged and moved they get to pat themselves on the back for feeling bad for this man... even if that man was just singing a song about Jews being gorillas or about ignoring the plight of others or what's happening in the country in the name of the apathy that so powered the nazis god I HATE THIS VERSION SO... so a lot of times productions also have to be wary about who they're playing too and how to elicit the response they want, even if it means cheap choices, because just being very Good, doesn't mean the audience will be very good if that makes sense. While I mention Csbsret I will admit those productions know how to let its audience have fun, and while I don't agree with using fake writer representation that is immediately killed to make an audience comfortable with a fascist story, people leave those productions happier, and that results in good energy.



I went off on a tangent there.



My worst audience was for August Osage County on Broadway. I loved it, but the audience was tapping its toes, obviously disconnected, quiet, no applause at interval, and a lot of seats opened up for act 2 or 3, and I was able to move up. And I get that... not everyone is moved by misery.

Updated On: 7/21/19 at 05:27 AM

I think al along audiences have had a bad times here and there. Nowadays though they're also selfish and insist on telegraphing it to everyone around them.

Oklahoma! The audience gave a rather half-hearted standing ovation (because that's what you do), and the cast was outstanding, but the "reimagined" production? The worst. The audience high-tailed out of there as soon as they could. My friend and I were just amazed at what a bizarre production it was.

Yes, I get that they are trying to show the formation of the United States as much uglier than we imagine. But between the "ballet", the weird dark video projections (Jud and Curly especially), and of course, the ending, it was weirder than I expected. And what was with Aunt Eller and the 20 boxes of Jiffy Cornbread mix? Isn't this 1906 or something? Whatever.

I did see a Wed matinee in Chicago of "Hedwig" and the obviously blue hair subscription audience (disclaimer I would be a blue hair except for a lot of Loreal #5A) didn't get it at all, which I expected. I had seen a Friday evening performance of Hedwig with NPH in NYC which was fabulous, because the audience was so excited.

Updated On: 7/21/19 at 09:07 AM

Other than clapping *after* songs and after scenes and laughing when things are funny, I'm not sure that the audience should be showing more enthusiasm. Any time that people are so enthusiastic that they feel they have to start screaming and applauding *over* a performer who is *still performing* just to show how excited they are, they prevent equally excited but less narcissistic theatre-goers from hearing the end of the song that they were so looking forward to hearing. If screaming over the performers as if to say "don't listen to her gorgeous singing, listen to my off-putting screeching instead for the last 15 seconds of this song" is enthusiasm, then i for one wish for much less of it.

Jarethan said: "I saw Tootsie on a Wednesday afternoon in May,and the audience was pretty disinterested in the show. They barely applauded at the end of Act 1, after the big production number, which validated my own opinion of the show."

I actually just saw Tootsie the other day. The audience as a whole was definitely eating it up. There was very enthusiastic applause and laughter throughout, but just not in my section, oddly enough. The people ahead of me hardly, if ever, applauded, and the man next to me didn't laugh once. Overheard a conversation amongst a group a few rows ahead of me in which they thought the show was mediocre, and they got a few nods in agreement in their direction.

Jarethan said: "Interestingly, the audiences at King Lear cheered like it was opening night; and, much to my surprise, the audience at Gary applauded incredibly loudly."

The time I saw Gary, I noticed the audience was super into too. Seeing the reviews, it might have just been a good day, but I feel like I enjoyed the show more because of it. It's so odd that something like that probably changes people's opinion of a show as a whole, it can't be directly effected and yet changes every night.

At cats a majoraty of the audience was asleep or on their phones before the end of act one

Of course it's rude, but the majority of people don't care about other people's enjoyment of things. It's nothing they are thinking about while watching a show. Very depressing and infuriating.