Just because Rosie loved it doesn't make it a good show? Valid. But didn't Rosie also love Mary Poppins? So guess what? That doesn't make IT a good show, either. Doesn't Rose also love like,
everything? And Rosie isn't the only person who loved Spring Awakening -- many critics did, as well. Seriously, I'm hardly a big fan of Spring Awakening, but get a clue. It got a more-than decent critical response, and you're making claims that completely overlook that fact. You keep saying "just because it has lots of talk show appearances or just because Rosie loved it or just because it has a big fanbase, it isn't good," but you conveniently ignore the critical response; is that because you think it's infallible and you're in denial that something offensive to your sense of purity (which you seem to think you should impose upon everyone) might actually be good theater?
And if the topic is the same, no honey, people are not going to just discard the past and neglect to bring it up. You're making the same asinine arguments, and begging the past to be remembered. No comment stands alone or is "just a comment."
Yank, as for what sells versus art, I wouldn't count SA out; sex sells.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 2/17/07 at 09:36 PM