cats won best BOOK???
colm wilkenson didnt win best actor for les miz and that suprises me, though i dont know who beat him- anyone?
Oh! And...
2003-2004's Little Shop not getting a 'Best Musical Revivial' nod.
Joe Mantello not being nominated for his fantastic work as Wickeds director (for which he recieved a Drama Desk Award and an Outer Critics Circle Award.)
LSOH sucked. Hunter is great, it was not a good production.
Everyone knew Joe was going to win for Assassins, so Wicked was irrelevant.
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/5/04
Robert Lindsay for "Me and My Girl" beat Colm Wilkinson (who was also competing against fellow cast member Terrence Mann's Javert in the lead actor category). Not really an upset -- Lindsay gave a wonderful comedic performance and was the centerpiece of his show (Lindsay rarely left the stage -- Wilkinson's is a supporting role by comparison).
Jerome Robbins' Broadway winning Best Musical was not crazy at all. Against Black and Blue and Starmites, the only other nominees for Best Musical that year, it WAS the Best Musical of 1989.
Not really. If everyone knew he would win for Assassins, how come he won the other two awards for his helming of Wicked???? And Little Shop was a flawless production, and deserved way more than 1 Tony nod.
I don't know if Little Shop was flawless, but it DEFINATELY deserved more than one nod. Especially for technical stuff.
Swing Joined: 5/1/04
Wickedrocks: Are you associated with wicked or are you just a really psychotic fan?
Urinetown should have beaten Thoroughly Modern Millie for Best Musical.
My point about Jerome Robbins Broadway was that it wasn't a book musical - just a bunch of moments from other shows all thrown together.
ellie2: What is your problem? Does my liking Wicked affect you any? If so I'd love to know how and why, but I still wont fix it for you. Updated On: 7/6/04 at 04:01 PM
Broadway Star Joined: 7/4/04
Well, this one may seem obscure, but it's one of the ones I always questioned when it comes to my field. In the '58 season, there was a lot of great scenic work onstage. Just look at the list of contenders for the Tony that year:
Boris Aronson - J.B.
Ballou - The Legend of Lizzie
Ben Edwards - Jane Eyre
Oliver Messel - Rashomon
Donald Oenslager - A Majority of One
Teo Otto - The Visit
The Aronson and the Messel designs are classics, studied to this day because of their innovative use of stage space. But it was the Oenslager that took home the award.
And I have never understood that one.
I agree with the Urinetown and Mamma Mia! facts. They were both great shows, and a lot better than Millie, which I liked, but not loved. Urinetown DID win for it's book, score, and direction I believe, which is not bad. It was robbed of Best Musical, though. Mamma Mia! deserved at least two or three awards. It won NOTHING! That was surprising to me when I watched the Tonys for that year.
There is no rule that a show without a book can't win Best Musical - Ain't Misbehavin' is Exhibit #1. The "bunch of moments from other shows all thrown together," as you describe it, makes Jerome Robbins' Broadway sound artless, which it wasn't. Sure, the West Side Story, Fiddler, The King and I and Gypsy numbers had all been seen before and were well documented, but Robbins went to elaborate lengths to recreate the numbers from On The Town, Billion Dollar Baby, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum and High Button Shoes, among others, with a massive company, huge orchestra, and the original sets and costumes recreated on a gargantuan scale. Fosse (Exhibit #2), it wasn't.
And Rathnait, were you saying that Black and Blue (also bookless) or Starmites were more deserving of Best Musical?
Oh and.....
Gypsy not winning Best Musical nor Ethel Merman winning for her legendary portrayl of Mamma Rose.
Every musical has a book. The book is the shape of the musical--not just dialogue and not just regarding musicals with a throughline plot.
Leading Actor Joined: 5/16/03
Ethel Merman ("Gypsy") losing the Tony to Mary Martin ("The Sound of Music")
"Nine over "Dreamgirls" for Best Musical
"Avenue Q" over "Wicked" for Best Musical - not that I"m a "Wicked" lover; it is more ambitious in scope. So what if it occasionally faulters??
Broadway Star Joined: 7/4/04
>> Starmites
Definite proof that God has a sense of humour...
Okay, so then Contact shouldn't be in dispute either. And there had to be at least two other shows nominated besides Starmites and Black and Blue, no?
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/5/04
I really loved "Jerome Robbins' Broadway" -- it really set a new standard for musical revues and featured some terrific performances of some of the greatest scenes in musical theatre history. A memorable, one-of-a-kind event.
I agree with Margo.
I have a question, though. Was "Crazy For You" liked by critics? Cause it only won 3 Tonys I believe. And what about Nine and Dreamgirls? How were they recieved?
"One of a kind"...unless you count FOSSE.
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/5/04
1) The Best Musical category only has four nominees.
2) In 1989, because of lack of competition, there were only three nominees -- Jerome Robbins, Starmites and Black and Blue.
Thanks. Okay, you're all right then...Starmites and Black and Blue DID both suck...
The execution of "Fosse" could not compare in any way, shape or form to "Jerome Robbins' Broadway". The comparison is odious.
Videos