"shame, all of you who applaud this ridiculous behaviour by an 'actor'. if he was in character and in the scene, then the cell phone really wouldn't have bothered him. horrible actor, i say."
It sounds as if you're saying that audience reaction shouldn't affect the actor's performance. By that reasoning, when the audience laughs or applauds, the actor shouldn't hold till the reaction subsides a bit but should just keep going, as the character would in real life. "Who cares if the audience hears the next line? They're not really there. I'm in character in this other place, not at the theatre. My character doesn't hear the audience. I'm so in the moment in this other place that I don't even hear them."
It seems pretty clear that in this case most of the audience had already been taken so out of the moment that Griffiths stopping the scene was not going to break their belief in the reality any more than it had already been broken. His starting over gave them a chance to see the scene uninterrupted.
"this is a situation the FOH staff should have delt with, not an ACTOR."
Ideally, yes. But when the FOH staff fails to do anything, someone has to.
Updated On: 6/1/06 at 03:29 PM